Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 18:53:22 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Space and spacetime Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <8947f1c75ab514fb64386e4f565d0eb1@www.novabbs.com> <17da22baf80d7cc4$38419$437843$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <17da3a248be65204$38420$437843$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <17da75dec0671347$206783$437843$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <665bf2c2f8d8af99ae6b28936ec91eed@www.novabbs.com> <17da7d7a6a39459a$163213$431754$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <972e62f21cba1316f2184b61c6a0c401@www.novabbs.com> <17da9b4080dd35af$266525$441546$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <17dab8b50a072746$163214$431754$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <17dabca9290af769$189571$436234$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <93708b1befdea8fb7c18da1b3d12630d@www.novabbs.com> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak In-Reply-To: <93708b1befdea8fb7c18da1b3d12630d@www.novabbs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 143 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 16:53:22 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 5291 X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17dac4a0a98761ea$266527$441546$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 5698 W dniu 20.06.2024 o 18:01, gharnagel pisze: > Maciej Wozniak wrote: >> >> W dniu 20.06.2024 o 15:45, gharnagel pisze: >> > >> > Maciej Wozniak wrote: >> > > >> > > Just more repetitions and lies.  That's all Harrie has. >> > > Posted the proof dosens of times here and will post >> > > it many times more, be sure, trash. >> > > Wozzie is delusional, pretending he has posted "proofs" when > >> OK, trash - an observer going with c/2 through >> Solar system is going to measure the length of >> a day. What is the prediction of the physics >> of your idiot guru for the result? No precision >> better than 1% needed. > > A "day"?  What is a "day"? A day is a day, Harrie. You're an incredible idiot, sure, but you've heard of days, haven't you? The observer is in the solar system > and his speed is c/2.  With respect to what? To solar system, Harrie. >> > > and you can do nothing about it apart of >> > > barking, lying and slandering. >> > >> > Says the repetitious barker, liar and slanderer :-) >> > > Wozzie agrees that he is a barker, liar and slanderer since he > > >> No, I don't. > > You didn't reply, so that implies you agree with what I wrote. No, Harrie, it doesn't. And I don't agree. >> > > I'm sure you can prove LT are correct where they >> > > are correct; evan such an idiot should be able to >> > > manage such a task. > > I doubt if you could :-) Prove that something is valid when it is valid? > >> > > Have nothing against Lorentz and his transformations, >> > > anyway. >> > > They demonstrate that t' <> t > >> Nope, they need the interpretation of a relativistic >> idiot for that. > > Nope.  They need someone who is adept at algebra. Does that > leave you out? > >> > which explodes Wozzie's "proof." >> > So he has just admitted that he lied. > >> No,I didn't. > > Yeah, you did.  You are either demented or you're a liar. No, I didn't. You are both dementad and a liar. > >> Even such a piece of lying >> shit as Harrie is can't lie 100% of time, >> but it still can lie most of the time. > > Wozzie lies ALL of the time.  And he just did it again. Oh, did I? You DO lie 100% of time, Harrie? > Just like he does here by omission: > >> > > I do and it is. >> > > Only partly.  A whole body of information. >> > > > Samely as whole science is. >> > > That's where Wozzie goes off the rails.  He ignores the >> > most important part. > > So once again Wozzie admits by default that he is off the rails. Once again Harrie lies. > >> > > And thus, none of your noble specializations could >> > > mark you as an  invincible expert about it. >> > > You've just self-appointed yourself for that, >> > > as expected from a DK idiot. >> > >>> Pot, kettle black :-) > >> I'm actually an information engineer, poor >> trash. > > One who rejects valid information that he is prejudiced against. One that rejects an obvious lie of a religious maniac insisting that The Nature itself is speaking to him and his idiot gurus. > >> That's the specialization of dealing >> with information and its various constructs. >> No way I'm an invincible expert, of course... >> we could discuss, if you weren't such an >> arrogant not-even-layman idiot. > > Nice example of his prejudice again :-)) Just some sad truth, Harrie. >> > He says he has no problem with the LT, so does he >> > accept that c + v = c? > >> Tell me better, poor trash, whether you accept >> that Lorentz has prepared his transformations for >> his own  ether theory, not  for The Shit of your >> idiot guru? > > Ah, Wozzie won't answer the question, deflecting with an If LT were designed for an ether theory the "obvious" c+v=c interpretation of The Shit's worshippers can't be that obvios, don't you think, Harrie, poor halfbrain?