Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.szaf.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Robert Woodward Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: "Drakon" by S. M. Stirling Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:47:10 -0700 Organization: home user Lines: 77 Message-ID: References: <0001HW.2C0BDD05000713EB7000090E038F@news.supernews.com> X-Trace: individual.net C1MEQGKortkJgS/DvSkbIgeXu3cPBHYYE8vCFz51hxAcAlMnyg X-Orig-Path: robertaw Cancel-Lock: sha1:5TvE1eeHVnqV7bV3eECZ2f2r9FQ= sha256:hRc109whIxrr6dRtrKP3R+XCfxGyUQ7IhYBQ/e49EFM= User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (Intel Mac OS X) Bytes: 4596 In article , Lynn McGuire wrote: > On 6/17/2024 11:49 AM, Robert Woodward wrote: > > In article , > > Lynn McGuire wrote: > > > >> On 6/16/2024 11:48 AM, Robert Woodward wrote: > >>> In article , > >>> Dimensional Traveler wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 6/15/2024 10:03 AM, Robert Woodward wrote: > >>>>> In article , > >>>>> ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan ) wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> In article , > >>>>>> Robert Carnegie wrote: > >>>>>>> So is this series basically Nazi fanfiction? > >>>>>>> I can do without that. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> No. There is nobody (including the author) rooting for the Draka. > >>>>>> They are portrayed as awful and evil. However, sometimes evil wins. > >>>>> > >>>>> Except that the timeline in the appendix to the first novel, _Marching > >>>>> Through Georgia_, contained many events that I consider to be > >>>>> extraordinarily unlikely* (even assuming that the unlikely previous > >>>>> events happened). > >>>>> > >>>>> *For values of "extremely unlikely" equal to a successful Operation > >>>>> Sealion (Nazi Germany invasion of Great Britain in 1940). > >>>>> > >>>> In partial mitigation extremely unlikely things have happened in > >>>> reality. Also the point of the books was a dystopia as horrible as the > >>>> author could manage so.... > >>> > >>> There is a difference between "improbable" and "implausible". IMHO, many > >>> events in the Draka timeline look implausible. > >> > >> Depends on how you feel about the Drakas unifying the continent of > >> Africa under their iron hand in the middle 1800s. > >> > > > > Africa is a big place (it is bigger than North America). It was not > > exactly lightly populated. There would had been about an order of > > magnitude fewer Draka than Americans. The disease environment would work > > in the Draka disfavor. In summary, no way, no how. > > Did you mean "an order of magnitude fewer Draka than" AFRICANS ? > No, I meant Americans. The Draka had to run rampant over a larger area with drastically fewer people than USA did and had in the 19th century. > S. M. Stirling seems to disagree with you about the Domination of > Africa. Remember, the Domination was all about the enslavement of every > other human on Earth for the purposes of the Draka. > Since I am utterly unconvinced in the plausibility of the timeline he offered on how this was done; I don't care about his opinion on the matter. I am speaking of abrupt un-suspension of willing suspension of disbelief. > And George Washington was one of the richest people on the planet in the > middle 1700s. He was 3% of the economy of the USA. I suspect that he > could have raised the funds to exile the Loyalists to any place that he > wanted to. He chose Canada for most of them. Where is your source for the extent of George Washington's wealth? I don't believe it. I don't think he was even 3% of Virgina's economy. -- "We have advanced to new and surprising levels of bafflement." Imperial Auditor Miles Vorkosigan describes progress in _Komarr_. —----------------------------------------------------- Robert Woodward robertaw@drizzle.com