Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 05:02:10 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Criminal Records Expunged for St. Louis Gun Couple Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv References: <17dafa563c68a967$159724$3694546$c0d58a68@news.newsdemon.com> Content-Language: en-US From: trotsky In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 77 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!193.141.40.65.MISMATCH!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 10:02:10 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 3926 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17db99ee0b8ccd68$237$3767249$10d55a65@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 4417 On 6/22/24 4:16 PM, moviePig wrote: > On 6/22/2024 11:52 AM, BTR1701 wrote: >> FPP wrote: >>> On 6/21/24 5:17 AM, trotsky wrote: >>>> On 6/20/24 8:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> In article , FPP >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/19/24 3:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>> In article , >>>>>>>     moviePig wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 6/19/2024 12:27 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article , >>>>>>>>>      moviePig wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 6/18/2024 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In article , >>>>>>>>>>>       "Adam H. Kerman" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ST. LOUIS (AP) - A judge has expunged the misdemeanor >>>>>>>>>>>>> convictions >>>>>>>>>>>>> of a St. Louis couple who waved guns at racial injustice >>>>>>>>>>>>> protesters >>>>>>>>>>>>> outside their mansion in 2020. Now they want their guns back. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I had no idea that four years later, this still hadn't >>>>>>>>>>>> happened. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It was a gated community, which are all over St. Louis. They >>>>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>>>> trespassing. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Apparently 'trespassing' is a meaningless term when you're doing >>>>>>>>>>> it for >>>>>>>>>>> 'social justice'. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Don't you even *pretend* there's a built-in tug-of-war between >>>>>>>>>> "trespassing" and "peaceable assembly"? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Maybe in a public place like a university quad, but not in a >>>>>>>>> private >>>>>>>>> residential neighborhood. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Under the presumption that each point of view must give some ground >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why would you presume that? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'd say that the protesters' rights depend on history, geometry, >>>>>>>> etc. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd say (and I'd be right) that no protester has rights to come >>>>>>> onto my >>>>>>> private property at all. I'm the only one who gets to decide who's >>>>>>> allowed and who isn't. It's pretty much in the definition. >>>>>>> >>>>>> They were in the street, not on McClosky's property. >>>>> >>>>> The street was private property, too, smooth brain. >>>> >>>> >>>> Lying sack o' shit alert.  Can you prove to us the McShitbags owned the >>>> street?  Of course you can't because you're a lying sack o' shit. >>>> >>> >>> Doesn't matter if the fucking King of Prussia owned the street, you >>> can't menace people with guns. > > >> You can when they're menacing you. > > Afaik, pissing you off isn't "menacing you". Especially when the horribly menaced people are the ones carrying weapons.