Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Cursitor Doom Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Challenger Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:45:17 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 70 Message-ID: References: <5a5a6jtfh1je18lr297jrh10oihptl2tgo@4ax.com> <3ltb6j1v7miinkbhb0f3n6gknud5j9eeb8@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 18:45:17 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0e5fb7834f5491e6b8b4e06047e3b926"; logging-data="159891"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+SfPFmLxZPl98ElDNQ+beyWLRqnEgMmak=" User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Hz0WxtzjvGsCQ8fHVzyE+gYqF/4= Bytes: 4227 On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 18:06:36 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote: > On 13/06/2024 3:11 am, Cursitor Doom wrote: >> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 15:06:49 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote: >> >>> On 12/06/2024 8:43 am, Cursitor Doom wrote: >>>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 00:55:21 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 10/06/2024 8:05 am, Cursitor Doom wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 09 Jun 2024 11:47:50 -0700, john larkin wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 17:29:13 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 09 Jun 2024 08:08:26 -0700, john larkin wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 08:21:52 +0100, Jeff Layman >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 09/06/2024 03:42, john larkin wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> So about as reliable a statistic as their figures for historical >>>>>> CO2 in the atmosphere, then. >>>>> >>>>> Not really. We've been observing the CO2 level in the atmosphere >>>>> continuously since 1958 and Manua Loa wasn't NASA. >>>>> >>>>> The entirely independent Cape Grim observatory got going in 1976 - >>>>> it's run by Australia's CSIRO >>>>> >>>>> https://capegrim.csiro.au/ >>>>> >>>>> and presents much the same story. It's southern hemisphere rather >>>>> than northern hemisphere so that the annual fluctuation isn't as >>>>> big. >>>>> >>>>> NASA estimate of how many shuttles' they'd lose were just that - >>>>> they dated back to before they'd lost any. >>>>> >>>>> You objections to the thoroughly reliable climate data involve your >>>>> demented conspiracy theory which has everybody involved in taking >>>>> the published the measurements consistently lying to the public for >>>>> more than sixty years. >>>>> >>>>> Nobody even thought that anyone would bother until around 1990, when >>>>> global warming hit statistical significance, and the fossil carbon >>>>> extraction industry woke up the threat to their long term cash >>>>> flows. >>>> >>>> Sorry, Bill. I've got better things to do than get drawn into another >>>> of your pointless pissing contests. >>> >>> Lying about the science evidence demonstrating that climate change is >>> happening is a well-paid commercial activity. You aren't remotely >>> good enough at it to get paid for it, but that doesn't seem to stop >>> you hoping that you might. > > >> Nice try, Bill, but I'm not falling for it. I know a barb when I see it >> and I'm not getting hooked. Try plying your trade on some other poor >> sap. > > You've gotten well hooked by climate change denial propaganda, and > thrashing around pretending to be sceptical is just more of your futile > attempts to evade the point. The barb is deeply embedded. You probably > need a brain implant to get off the hook, and you'd probably reject > functional brain tissue as incompatible with your right-wing goof > genome. Nope. Still not tempted. You need to up your game, Bill.