Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moviePig Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Criminal Records Expunged for St. Louis Gun Couple Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 17:16:29 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 68 Message-ID: References: <17dafa563c68a967$159724$3694546$c0d58a68@news.newsdemon.com> Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 23:16:29 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ba6e416936843ce5425f0998d75a04d7"; logging-data="4136394"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Naz+FKgb82R5z/WGb/2zDxSbTX4P5FmY=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:4XVzufiLxG8foIoWPu+5lZkRuXk= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 4195 On 6/22/2024 11:52 AM, BTR1701 wrote: > FPP wrote: >> On 6/21/24 5:17 AM, trotsky wrote: >>> On 6/20/24 8:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>> In article , FPP >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6/19/24 3:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>> In article , >>>>>>    moviePig wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6/19/2024 12:27 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>> In article , >>>>>>>>     moviePig wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 6/18/2024 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In article , >>>>>>>>>>      "Adam H. Kerman" wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ST. LOUIS (AP) - A judge has expunged the misdemeanor convictions >>>>>>>>>>>> of a St. Louis couple who waved guns at racial injustice >>>>>>>>>>>> protesters >>>>>>>>>>>> outside their mansion in 2020. Now they want their guns back. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I had no idea that four years later, this still hadn't happened. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It was a gated community, which are all over St. Louis. They were >>>>>>>>>>> trespassing. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Apparently 'trespassing' is a meaningless term when you're doing >>>>>>>>>> it for >>>>>>>>>> 'social justice'. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Don't you even *pretend* there's a built-in tug-of-war between >>>>>>>>> "trespassing" and "peaceable assembly"? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Maybe in a public place like a university quad, but not in a private >>>>>>>> residential neighborhood. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Under the presumption that each point of view must give some ground >>>>>> >>>>>> Why would you presume that? >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd say that the protesters' rights depend on history, geometry, etc. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd say (and I'd be right) that no protester has rights to come onto my >>>>>> private property at all. I'm the only one who gets to decide who's >>>>>> allowed and who isn't. It's pretty much in the definition. >>>>>> >>>>> They were in the street, not on McClosky's property. >>>> >>>> The street was private property, too, smooth brain. >>> >>> >>> Lying sack o' shit alert.  Can you prove to us the McShitbags owned the >>> street?  Of course you can't because you're a lying sack o' shit. >>> >> >> Doesn't matter if the fucking King of Prussia owned the street, you >> can't menace people with guns. > > You can when they're menacing you. Afaik, pissing you off isn't "menacing you".