Path: ...!news.misty.com!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Default User" Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 07:11:56 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 8 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 09:11:56 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6dc2e553daf0c6565d5bf5e005e4dcd0"; logging-data="1136856"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/PvbmN5b878G1AEj82g9F6+51WODHxe7Y=" User-Agent: XanaNews/1.19.1.320 Cancel-Lock: sha1:EYfYEGCMT0wNAxAMMsCAns8RPzM= Bytes: 1272 James Nicoll wrote: > "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them > > Inexplicably not titled "Why I Own Most of Hal Clement's Novels." I think just a general "what's right with the book resonantes enough with the reader that the other things can be overlooked."