Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 16:27:20 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Space and spacetime Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <419d1cda40b2d72908760701d026eaae@www.novabbs.com> <17da1b3b4c16dc2c$49683$431754$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <8947f1c75ab514fb64386e4f565d0eb1@www.novabbs.com> <17da22baf80d7cc4$38419$437843$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <17da3a248be65204$38420$437843$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <17da75dec0671347$206783$437843$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <665bf2c2f8d8af99ae6b28936ec91eed@www.novabbs.com> <17da7d7a6a39459a$163213$431754$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <972e62f21cba1316f2184b61c6a0c401@www.novabbs.com> <17da9b4080dd35af$266525$441546$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <17dab8b50a072746$163214$431754$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 117 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 14:27:22 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 4815 X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17dabca9290af769$189571$436234$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 5222 W dniu 20.06.2024 o 15:45, gharnagel pisze: > Maciej Wozniak wrote: >> >> W dniu 20.06.2024 o 14:26, gharnagel pisze: >> > >> > Maciej Wozniak wrote: >> > > >> > > W dniu 20.06.2024 o 00:09, gharnagel pisze: >> > > > >> > > > Wozzie posts nothing but repetitions and lies. >> > > > He claims to be an information whatsit, claims science is >> > > > information, then denies a major part of science. >> > > >> > > See, trash - I've proven the idiocies >> > > of your insane guru to be not even consistent, >> > > Just more repetitions and lies.  That's all Wozzie has.  Why >> > doesn't he post his "proof" of give a link to it? >> >> Just more repetitions and lies.  That's all Harrie has. >> Posted the proof dosens of times here and will post >> it many times more, be sure, trash. > > Wozzie is delusional, pretending he has posted "proofs" when OK, trash - an observer going with c/2 through Solar system is going to measure the length of a day. What is the prediction of the physics of your idiot guru for the result? No precision better than 1% needed. >> > > and you can do nothing about it apart of >> > > barking, lying and slandering. >> > > Says the repetitious barker, liar and slanderer :-) > > Wozzie agrees that he is a barker, liar and slanderer since he No, I don't. You'rea barker, liar and slanderer, but that was obvious before. > >> > > But you'll do what you can for your moronic church - >> > > that's what it trains its doggies for, after all. >> > > I can actually "prove" that the LT is correct in its domain >> > of applicability based on actual [gasp!] information. > >> I'm sure you can prove LT are correct where they >> are correct; evan such an idiot should be able to >> manage such a task. >> Have nothing against Lorentz and his transformations, >> anyway. > > They demonstrate that t' <> t Nope, they need the interpretation of a relativistic idiot for that. , which explodes Wozzie's "proof." > So he has just admitted that he lied. No,I didn't. Even such a piece of lying shit as Harrie is can't lie 100% of time, but it still can lie most of the time. >> I do and it is. > > Only partly.  A whole body of information. > >> Samely as whole science is. > > That's where Wozzie goes off the rails.  He ignores the > most important part. > >> And thus, none of your noble specializations could >> mark you as an  invincible expert about it. >> You've just self-appointed yourself for that, >> as expected from a DK idiot. > > > Pot, kettle black :-) I'm actually an information engineer, poor trash. That's the specialization of dealing with information and its various constructs. No way I'm an invincible expert, of course... we could discuss, if you weren't such an arrogant not-even-layman idiot. > >> > and then denies the information of physics. > >> Of course. What is inconsistent in denying >> some information concocted by some religious >> maniacs? > > > Wozzie makes a biased judgment on the source of the > information rather than the information itself. Nope. Another slander from a lying piece of shit. > He says he has no problem with the LT, so does he > accept that c + v = c? Tell me better, poor trash, whether you accept that Lorentz has prepared his transformations for his own ether theory, not for The Shit of your idiot guru?