Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniel70 Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho Subject: Re: Dave Yadallee denies reality, bears false witness Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 19:05:36 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 59 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 11:05:36 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7b09042c30500e3719d82b4c4a3d47c0"; logging-data="299201"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19AHODrPV7LlGSMjC1lUFsbmPQwJwAvFGE=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:mhp48liT4FxvAHlSHrd4ohI9QJQ= In-Reply-To: Bytes: 3479 The Doctor wrote on 22/6/24 10:55 pm: > In article , The Last Doctor > wrote: >> Daniel70 wrote: >>> The Doctor wrote on 22/6/24 8:40 am: >>>> In article , Daniel70 >>>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>> 32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit >>>>> such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but >>>>> have pleasure in them that do them. >>>> >>>> Exacellent! >>>> >>>> Now quote Acts where it JEsus Says Paul is my servant. >>> >>> Sorry!! Are YOU, Gobble-de-gook, now calling Jesus an 'it'?? >>> >>> And I very much doubt Jesus would have know Saul/Paul at all, >>> Gobble-de-gook, so Jesus would not have called Saul/Paul >>> anything, Gobble-de-gook. >>> >>> Maybe YOU, Gobble-de-gook, should try *LISTENING* to YOUR >>> preacher when he is preaching to YOU, Gobble-de-gook!! >> >> According to Luke the Evangelist (student of Paul and writer of the >> Gospel of Luke - which used the earlier Gospel of Mark as the core >> of its narrative - and of Acts, where this story is found), the >> spirit of Jesus visited the apostle Ananias in a dream and sent him >> to cure Saul of Tarsus of blindness because Saul was Jesus’ >> chosen instrument to spread the name of Jesus to the Gentiles, >> their kings, and the Jews. >> >> No one is saying that Paul did not believe himself to be a servant >> of Jesus, or that Acts doesn’t claim that. >> >> However that still doesn’t mean that words of Saul, later Paul, >> to the Romans, about homosexual acts, were the words of Jesus. They >> were the words of Paul. >> >> Come on Dave. You said JESUS condemned homosexuals, not Paul. >> Where? > > So if you link Acts 9 and Acts 13 , what do you get? Well, to my Understanding, The Acts of The Apostles was written *AFTER* Jesus had risen into Heaven, nothing there was SAID BY JESUS, just The Apostles, perhaps, retelling/reinterpreting what Jesus had said. Anybody for a Game of Chinese Whispers?? > Or does logic elude you MM? I'm guessing Mike is a hell of a lot closer to Logic than YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are!! -- Daniel