Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: FPP Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Criminal Records Expunged for St. Louis Gun Couple Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 21:33:30 -0400 Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn. Lines: 54 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 03:33:31 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="135701bad7255964217cc25f17b69a9f"; logging-data="2981112"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19bLIIHDlOPBv18nr9DEQHH" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:G+0Mih3ppRfDUfbn9dQOcq6Glr4= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3482 On 6/19/24 3:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > In article , > moviePig wrote: > >> On 6/19/2024 12:27 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> In article , >>> moviePig wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/18/2024 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> In article , >>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> ST. LOUIS (AP) - A judge has expunged the misdemeanor convictions >>>>>>> of a St. Louis couple who waved guns at racial injustice protesters >>>>>>> outside their mansion in 2020. Now they want their guns back. >>>>>> >>>>>> I had no idea that four years later, this still hadn't happened. >>>>>> >>>>>> It was a gated community, which are all over St. Louis. They were >>>>>> trespassing. >>>>> >>>>> Apparently 'trespassing' is a meaningless term when you're doing it for >>>>> 'social justice'. >>>> >>>> Don't you even *pretend* there's a built-in tug-of-war between >>>> "trespassing" and "peaceable assembly"? >>> >>> Maybe in a public place like a university quad, but not in a private >>> residential neighborhood. >> >> Under the presumption that each point of view must give some ground > > Why would you presume that? > >> I'd say that the protesters' rights depend on history, geometry, etc. > > I'd say (and I'd be right) that no protester has rights to come onto my > private property at all. I'm the only one who gets to decide who's > allowed and who isn't. It's pretty much in the definition. > They were in the street, not on McClosky's property. -- On May 30, 2024 Donald J. Trump was unanimously convicted on 34 felony counts in New York City... so I took this picture in my side yard. https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0 "Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC Bible 25B.G. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0