Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniel70 Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho Subject: Re: Dave Yadallee denies reality, bears false witness Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 20:50:21 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 57 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 12:50:22 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9244785ec1aafce1f0a751bf29b88798"; logging-data="3919427"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/SAzUvpkH2Q6W+yc34xJWNNP0xWeUJIwk=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:kxlOA0ATk/LYvrD3+vT9Q6qHhDA= In-Reply-To: Bytes: 3314 The Doctor wrote on 22/6/24 8:42 am: > In article , solar penguin > wrote: >> Daniel declared: >>> The Doctor wrote on 21/6/24 9:25 pm: >>>> In article , Blueshirt >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> But Dave, the Bible really does say nothing about Jewus >>>>> condemning "homosexuals" and most definitely not in Romans I >>>>> (As has been pointed out to you already.) So any person >>>>> claiming that he did is either delusional or hasn't read the >>>>> Bible. This is a simple fact. Anything else is a lie. >>>>> >>>>> If you are only repeating what your Pastor told you, point >>>>> him in our direction and we will correct him! >>>> >>>> Ever read Romans 1? >>>> >>> Just for YOU, Gobble-de-gook, from YOUR BIBLE of choice, so YOU >>> know of which we converse .... >>> >>> Where does it mention homosexuals, Gobble-de-gook?? >>> >>> https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Romans-Chapter-1/ Roman 1 >> >> SNIP > > But and lie in action. "But and lie"?? Now that's different!! >>> 27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the >>> woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men >>> working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that >>> recompence of their error which was meet. >> >> I think this is the verse the idiot was thinking of. >> >> But it isn’t quoting Jesus, and doesn’t mention anyone >> condemning themselves to eternal damnation. >> >> Is it even about homosexuality? Well, in wider context, it seems to >> be referring to ritual sex acts as part of pagan temple ceremonies. >> (Perhaps Paul was just too naïve to believe men had sex with each >> other for pleasure!) >> >> So, the idiot is wrong on all three counts. That’s typical for >> him. > > You really are dense SP! Perhaps Solar Penguin is just waiting for YOU, Gobble-de-gook, to explain YOURSELF more fully, Gobble-de-gook .... as are the rest of us, Gobble-de-gook! -- Daniel