Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael S Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Privilege Levels Below User Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:43:40 +0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 30 Message-ID: <20240616124340.00005ef7@yahoo.com> References: <20240616015526.00005a09@yahoo.com> <20240616103447.00004b19@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 11:43:24 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="803ce1cb02e96f5cc52a73edab1c8c37"; logging-data="4157539"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18uN76Zh8Jra/HiV19uq1/s15Hz0dmP1cQ=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:TNbJ394r79/FPRQc47ANETpaNqw= X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Bytes: 2217 On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 08:49:42 -0000 (UTC) Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 10:34:47 +0300, Michael S wrote: >=20 > > On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 02:52:02 -0000 (UTC) Lawrence D'Oliveiro > > wrote: > > =20 > >> On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 01:55:26 +0300, Michael S wrote: > >> =20 > >> > Do you use video codecs in FF for correctness or only for > >> > efficiency? =20 > >>=20 > >> I think FFmpeg is one of those basic toolkits that has already been > >> ported to OpenPOWER. =20 > >=20 > > Is it capable to decode H264? =20 >=20 > I=E2=80=99m surprised you didn=E2=80=99t know, since you were the one who= mentioned > it. >=20 > It has options to build against toolkits for every codec and file > format that is still worth using these days, and a few more besides. All I know about it is that typical FF installation on x86-64 uses plug in provided by Cisco. I have no idea if the reason for it is technical or legal.