Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: FPP Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Cruz Destroys Gender Activist Judge During Hearing Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:57:43 -0400 Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn. Lines: 267 Message-ID: References: <_qidnWbvU5joYdL7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:57:46 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8c297682e1b5a8a64069ab9d5fe6da9b"; logging-data="1439588"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/62njlda8CZ18W3l+/BEGJ" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:8YR8+SC+PDX1DFHb6fmrupDkAGc= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 14152 On 6/10/24 1:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > On Jun 10, 2024 at 4:21:06 AM PDT, "FPP" wrote: > >> On 6/8/24 9:48 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> On Jun 7, 2024 at 5:51:24 AM PDT, "FPP" wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/4/24 5:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> On Jun 4, 2024 at 8:25:10 AM PDT, "FPP" wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/3/24 10:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>> In article , FPP >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 6/3/24 2:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article , FPP >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 6/2/24 10:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> FPP wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/2/24 3:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So when you said you don't talk about another state's governor because >>>>>>>>>>>>> he doesn't affect your life... that was... wait for it... a lie. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> How does eating out affect my life? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Now, trying to destroy capitalism and education in the country is >>>>>>>>>>>> another matter. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Your own words: another state's governor doesn't affect my life. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Weird how you're now claiming some governors have the power to >>>>>>>>>>> do exactly >>>>>>>>>>> that by "destroying capitalism and education" throughout the entire >>>>>>>>>>> country by signing laws that only apply to their respective states. How >>>>>>>>>>> does DeSantis signing an education bill that only applies to Florida >>>>>>>>>>> affect your life, Effa? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Still no answer here. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> But for some reason when Newsom signs laws, according to Effa the Hutt, >>>>>>>>>>> he only has the power to affect California, despite the fact >>>>>>>>>>> that in many >>>>>>>>>>> cases, he actually does affect the whole country with his bullshit. Like >>>>>>>>>>> when he banned all gas-powered vehicles by 2035. That affects the whole >>>>>>>>>>> country because California is such a large percentage of the car market, >>>>>>>>>>> vehicle manufacturers conform their products to California standards >>>>>>>>>>> regardless of where they'll eventually be sold. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Newsom went out to eat. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Newsom did exactly what Cruz did that gets your panties in a twist: he >>>>>>>>> went on vacation while his state was in crisis. And he did it twice. >>>>>>>>> Cruz only did it once. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> DeSantis is destroying a state. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Not your state. Doesn't affect your life. Your words. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nope. False equivalence. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Newsom owned up to it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Newsom never 'owned up' to fleeing the state for vacation. Once he got >>>>>>> caught, he admitted his maskless indoor dining at the French Laundry was >>>>>>> wrong. But he never gave a mea culpa for being on vacation in Cabo while >>>>>>> he his state was on fire. >>>>>>> >>>>>> You guys caused the fires, ignoring climate change. >>>>> >>>>> To quote our newest Hutt: Nope. >>>>> >>>>> This nonsense that the California wildfires are due to 'climate change' is >>>>> ridiculous. Even Emperor Newsom has admitted that historically bad forest >>>>> management at both the federal and state level is a major factor in the >>>>> severity and frequency of the most recent wildfires. >>>>> >>>>> Anyone who thinks that if we'd all just installed more solar panels and >>>>> rode >>>>> our bikes to work, that the state wouldn't be on fire every year is >>>>> completely >>>>> delusional. And these idiotic media reporters and politicians who keep >>>>> saying >>>>> that the amount of acreage burned in California in 2019-- the worst fire >>>>> year >>>>> (2.2 million acres)-- is 'record-breaking' and 'unprecedented' are >>>>> bald-faced >>>>> liars. It's fucking factually completely untrue. >>>>> >>>>> Before the 1800s, California would see anywhere from 5 to 14 million acres >>>>> burn EVERY YEAR. That's 12% of the state burning every year. Before there >>>>> were >>>>> any SUVs or 'climate change'. Just as there were massive droughts in >>>>> California long before the era of 'climate change'. California had a >>>>> 500-year >>>>> drought between 800 and 1300 AD. These are documented scientific facts, >>>>> but >>>>> that undermines the Agenda, so we get flat-out lies from politicians >>>>> claiming >>>>> this is unprecedented, which goes completely unchallenged by their media >>>>> lackeys. >>>>> >>>>> Excess timber comes out of a forest in only one of two ways. It's either >>>>> carried out or it burns up. We used to carry it out. It was called >>>>> logging. >>>>> We >>>>> had healthy forests and a thriving timber economy. Then in the 70s, we >>>>> began >>>>> imposing a shit-ton of environmental laws-- both at the state and federal >>>>> level-- that have made it all but impossible and wildly unprofitable to >>>>> carry >>>>> out that timber and what we've seen over those decades is increasingly >>>>> severe >>>>> forest fires. >>>>> >>>>> We've had an 80% decline in timber harvested out of California forests >>>>> since >>>>> 1980 and we've had 85% increase in acres destroyed by fire over that same >>>>> period. The mismanagement has gotten to the point where you can tell the >>>>> boundary between private forestland that is not affected by these laws and >>>>> the >>>>> public lands that are. The burn scars follow the property lines almost >>>>> exactly >>>>> in many cases. >>>>> >>>>> Wow, the climate sure is clever to only change over the public lands and >>>>> burn >>>>> them while leaving the private lands alone, isn't it? >>>>> >>>>> An untended forest will grow and grow until it chokes itself off. When >>>>> there >>>>> are too many trees for the land to support, they start dying off, and that >>>>> dead timber becomes thousands of square miles of fuel, just waiting to be >>>>> set >>>>> ablaze. California currently has four times the timber density that the >>>>> land >>>>> can support. Even the reliably leftist L.A. Times, which never misses an >>>>> opportunity to blame something bad on 'climate change', noted that >>>>> there are >>>>> currently more than 150 million dead trees in the Sierra Nevada, just >>>>> waiting >>>>> to be ignited. That's how nature manages a forest and if we don't want >>>>> half >>>>> the state on fire, we have to do something other than nature's way. >>>>> >>>>> That's why we started the Forest Service to begin with-- to scientifically >>>>> manage the forests so that they're both preserved for people's use and to >>>>> keep >>>>> them healthy and reduce fires to a minimum. And we had healthy forests for >>>>> decades. But then the enviro-kooks came along and said "You're interfering >>>>> with nature! Stop it!" and got all sorts of laws passed requiring a >>>>> hands-off >>>>> approach to forestry and now here we are, with the entire West Coast >>>>> frequently ablaze. >>>>> >>>>> The Native American tribes understood this and would routinely both clear >>>>> away >>>>> dead trees and brush from around their settlements and villages and >>>>> conduct >>>>> controlled burns to reduce the possibility of large out-of-control fires. >>>>> Then >>>>> came the white environmentalists, who dismissed the practices of those >>>>> they >>>>> considered ignorant savages, and decided they knew better how to do >>>>> things. >>>>> Well, we're seeing how well that worked out, huh? >>>>> >>>>> But no, we're still having to deal with idiots like Pelosi, Newsom, >>>>> Occasional-Cortex, and Karen Bass who insist that this problem can be >>>>> solved >>>>> with carbon caps and solar panels and windmills, when the truth is that if >>>>> the >>>>> U.S. literally shut down all emissions COMPLETELY-- cars, gone; industry, >>>>> gone; cattle farming, gone; airplanes, gone; all of it, gone-- and we ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========