Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: FPP Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: 5th Circuit Strikes Down Bump Stock Ban Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 21:07:47 -0400 Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn. Lines: 63 Message-ID: References: <17d91fbd5fad865f$338100$533214$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com> <17d9412e82a8a311$8843$3053472$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com> <17d97111755ab6ae$133791$675878$4ed50460@news.newsdemon.com> Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 03:07:47 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="135701bad7255964217cc25f17b69a9f"; logging-data="2973347"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Nh1p52IqAPZHXkWYP7Ypa" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:FajqftQaPNPvh6gog3pFnC+k4Js= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 4469 On 6/18/24 10:33 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > In article , > moviePig wrote: > >> On 6/18/2024 9:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> In article , >>> moviePig wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/18/2024 5:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> In article , FPP >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Maybe if we all chipped in a few bucks, Clarenzabell and Sammy Flagflyer >>>>>> would change their votes. >>>>> >>>>> Weird how Alito's flag also has flown over San Francisco's city hall for >>>>> more than half a century. Hardly a bastion of conservatism, San >>>>> Francisco. Yet when SF prog pols fly it, it's no big deal. >>>>> >>>>> https://ibb.co/S6wFxDy >>>>> >>>>> It was also used prominently by BLM during their 'mostly peaceful' >>>>> Summer of Love. >>>>> >>>>> https://ibb.co/Z8kvvMc >>>>> >>>>> So to recap: a flag when flown by leftist pols and far-left violent >>>>> communist protest groups is totes cool, but the moment a conservative >>>>> raises it on his private property, he should be impeached and removed >>>>> from office. >>>> >>>> Yes, we hold a Supreme Court Justice to a stricter standard of >>>> impartiality than we do an organization like BLM. Life's unfair... >>> >>> Government officials are government officials. If it's not a problem for >>> the ones in San Francisco to fly it, it's not a problem for any official >>> to fly it. >> >> When I say "we hold a Supreme Court Justice to a stricter standard", I >> am, of course, speaking of a time when such fantasy seemed within reach. > > Now it's "we hold Supreme Court justices to a double standard". > > Just look at the faux-rage over Clarence Thomas's "perks"-- which I > acknowledge are unseemly-- but there's no similar outrage from the > pearl-clutchers on the Left over Kagan's and Sotomayor's indulgences. > FOUR MILLION DOLLARS isn't a perk, you fucking imbecile. Not reporting gifts is a violation of their ethical code, and any Federal official that did this to this extent would have been impeached and removed. -- On May 30, 2024 Donald J. Trump was unanimously convicted on 34 felony counts in New York City... so I took this picture in my side yard. https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0 "Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC Bible 25B.G. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0