Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
Subject: Re: Doctor Who: RTD in the Radio Times.
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 23:45:04 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <v4s30v$1cfu0$1@dont-email.me>
References: <xn0on0tk1ebn7yw000@post.eweka.nl> <v4gh7n$2nubg$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0on2i1cg4kjcs003@post.eweka.nl> <v4ibcj$326dt$2@dont-email.me>
 <xn0on3kobh3r1i4001@post.eweka.nl> <v4li3e$3rtm0$3@dont-email.me>
 <xn0on5eyej4hokc000@post.eweka.nl> <THKbO.75900$2RJ6.8979@fx05.ams4>
 <v4od3t$fqui$3@dont-email.me> <v4p6t8$krih$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4p8ql$l86u$1@dont-email.me> <v4pk6u$nbil$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0on6qnokg2pcq001@post.eweka.nl> <v4q7bo$trn6$1@dont-email.me>
 <vr2cO.8473$nACc.1339@fx07.ams4> <v4rsap$1b6eh$1@dont-email.me>
 <1xfcO.155173$9d96.88271@fx01.ams4>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 15:45:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bc3b23ee807acadd5f2431205913f471";
	logging-data="1458112"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18epgKwX21C2PjjmurXYIJtCYNRHs1nVIY="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:GctEiUzzNaPgLP/TxcbYg1t2fqA=
In-Reply-To: <1xfcO.155173$9d96.88271@fx01.ams4>
Bytes: 3935

Hornplayer9599 wrote on 18/6/24 10:59 pm:
> On 6/18/2024 06:50, Daniel70 wrote:
>> Hornplayer9599 wrote on 18/6/24 8:06 am:
>>> On 6/17/2024 15:46, The Last Doctor wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I see Aggie still doesn’t accept how the BARB ratings work.
>>> 
>>> How could he?  It would upset his own little world where he is
>>> always right if he did.  I'm also convinced that he doesn't even
>>> quote Doomcock (or any other YouTuber) correctly; rather he
>>> cherry-picks what he wants to hear, and takes things out of
>>> context if it helps stroke his own ego. (full disclosure, I
>>> subscribe to Doomcock and Nerdrotic...so I can tell when he's
>>> misquoting them...which is frequent regardless what Aggy
>>> claims.)
>>> 
>>> Dunning-Kruger is very strong with him.
>>> 
>>> I'm also convinced that Aggy couldn't run a used car dealership
>>> that had only one car on the lot.
>>> 
>> I have been wondering ... if Doomcock actually gave an episode of 
>> 'Doctor Who' a winning score (say 7+), would Aggy ALSO give the 
>> episode a winning score??
> 
> Aggy is a lemming, and can't think for himself, so yes he would.
> 
>> Hornplayer, if you've been looking at Doomcock for a while, what
>> sort of opinion did Doomcock have of the Chris/JodieDoctor period??
>> (We all know Aggy hated it.)
> 
> He didn't like it.  He felt that the script writing was weak at best,
>  and that there were too many companions in the TARDIS for there to
> be enough for everyone to do in the story...especially when the story
> is 45 minutes long.  I would be dishonest if I didn't mention that he
> does hit the "woke" button aggressively...but when someone goes
> overboard with anything, people with intelligence can filter it out.
> When it's an unverified rumor, he state it as such; when he can
> verify things, he provides the source.  When he makes a prediction,
> his accuracy is usually pretty good...although not perfect.  Overall
> not really a bad channel, entertaining to me, and informative, and
> worth my time to watch...even if I don't always agree with his take
> on things (and there is nobody, not even my closest friends, that I
> agree with 100% of the time).
> 
O.K., thanks for that ..... but, now, can we assume that Aggy *IS*
Doomcock??
-- 
Daniel