Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Space and spacetime Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 18:47:51 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: References: <17dabca9290af769$189571$436234$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <93708b1befdea8fb7c18da1b3d12630d@www.novabbs.com> <17dac4a0a98761ea$266527$441546$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <9ae2e2bf5f37a77b3e1bd160981c6fd5@www.novabbs.com> <17db1164fde32607$208349$436234$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <392fcd2a13fa911f8f6d5182fb485f7b@www.novabbs.com> <17db1a8a53f81f54$288216$441546$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <766d95371391c171627beb10f0e1ae9c@www.novabbs.com> <17db25828bda4e92$4$479221$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <57daee8da23d6ae5103795e3c9012685@www.novabbs.com> <17db37832753b835$79$484409$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <3a011479b6a372004336be3d26a210b2@www.novabbs.com> <17db5d8196a1506d$500$479221$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="839109"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$mN0k/dO/84PaCfWy8GE9.OonOT30gmNM3F1jYExgw4JHoDnvDF0g. Bytes: 5113 Lines: 103 Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > W dniu 22.06.2024 o 15:54, gharnagel pisze: > > > > Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > > > > > You're pretending even stupider > > > than you are to dodge. > > >> No matter how many times Wozzie tells lies, i doesn't > > make them true.  His parents must be chagrinned at > > his abysmal behavior. > > And why won't you stop your iditic dodging > and answer what are the prediction of the moronic > physics of your moronic guru for my example? Wozzie "question" was "What does an observer going at c/2 through the solar system measure as the length of a day?" Since the observer is not on earth, a "day" is not well defined. I asked him if it was a day on earth, Mars, Jupiter, what? Also, since velocity is relative, what is the c/s with respect to? Autistic Wozzie-fool has refused to answer these pertinent questions, proving his dishonesty by asking stupid and irrelevant questions in return: > > > You must define "clearly and honestly". And "define". > > > And "must". > > > > Such terms are human terms, and those that are fully human > > understand them implicitly.  Terms like "speed" and "time" > > are the terms of physicists, i.e. Gods. > I'm getting it. ?? Wozzie makes no sense, as usual. Then he pivots to a different question: > > > > > So, according to you and your idiot gurus - > > > > > in LET every observer, stationary in ether or not - > > > > > would observe light moving at speed c. Right? > > > > > > > > What's the matter, mathematically-incompetent Wozzie, > > > > can't actually USE the theory and calculate the answer > > > > for yourself? And dishonest Wozzie projects his incompetence on others: And then he pivots to a third question: "Is the RELATIVISTIC formula of velocity adding a part of Lorentz's ETHER theory? Yes or no" So it's become quite confusing just which question Wozzie wants answered. > > > The matter is that mathematically-incompetent Harrie > > > can't actually USE the theory and calculate the answer > > > for me. > > > > I offered to derive the LTE for Wozzie, > > But can't deal with a set of assumptions > different than The Shit of your idiot guru. > It's not very complicated, but - well - > you're an idiot. Wozzie-liar is projecting again. > > > A lie, of course. First - Lorentz invented his > > > equations for his ether theory,  then - your > > > idiot guru came with his absurd postulates. > > > > So the "absurd" postulates result in the LTE exactly as > > Lorentz invented them out of whole cloth, so how could they > > possibly be absurd > > Simply. Yes, Wozzie is a simpleton. > > > Unlike the Holy Postulates,  told your > > > idiot gurus by Nature itself when She > > > spoke to them. Right, Harrie? > > > > Postulates are human constructs also, but they can be tested > > against [nature]. > > Only such an idiot can believe and repeat such > an absurd lie. So Wozzie denies that human constructs (like the constancy of the speed of light) can't be tested against nature? What is the matter with this demented fool? > But - see: 0 meridian has something in common with both The Shit > of your idiot guru and Lorontz ether theory, after all... So Wozzie believes that 0 meridian is a fundamental property of nature, like the speed of light? This moron has gone totally off the rails. Python, call that nurse NOW!