Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Space and spacetime Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:45:18 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: References: <419d1cda40b2d72908760701d026eaae@www.novabbs.com> <17da1b3b4c16dc2c$49683$431754$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <8947f1c75ab514fb64386e4f565d0eb1@www.novabbs.com> <17da22baf80d7cc4$38419$437843$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <17da3a248be65204$38420$437843$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <17da75dec0671347$206783$437843$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <665bf2c2f8d8af99ae6b28936ec91eed@www.novabbs.com> <17da7d7a6a39459a$163213$431754$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <972e62f21cba1316f2184b61c6a0c401@www.novabbs.com> <17da9b4080dd35af$266525$441546$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <17dab8b50a072746$163214$431754$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="604266"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="2U0RwOYzNU+ijpgbVXd5Zmcos0AIe32+I2dWAQYE4iw"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$PEmRMjz7P2DjRfP6yszCpOXXNut64./Aa2fZ8X2UKEXEI6vTPN3Hm Bytes: 4580 Lines: 91 Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > W dniu 20.06.2024 o 14:26, gharnagel pisze: > > > > Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > > > > > W dniu 20.06.2024 o 00:09, gharnagel pisze: > > > > > > > > Wozzie posts nothing but repetitions and lies. > > > > He claims to be an information whatsit, claims science is > > > > information, then denies a major part of science. > > > > > > See, trash - I've proven the idiocies > > > of your insane guru to be not even consistent, > > > > Just more repetitions and lies.  That's all Wozzie has.  Why > > doesn't he post his "proof" of give a link to it? > > Just more repetitions and lies. That's all Harrie has. > Posted the proof dosens of times here and will post > it many times more, be sure, trash. Wozzie is delusional, pretending he has posted "proofs" when he has done nothing of the sort. His t' = t nonsense is not proof of anything except that he is dishonest. > > > and you can do nothing about it apart of > > > barking, lying and slandering. > > > > Says the repetitious barker, liar and slanderer :-) Wozzie agrees that he is a barker, liar and slanderer since he hasn't denied it. > > > But you'll do what you can for your moronic church - > > > that's what it trains its doggies for, after all. > > > > I can actually "prove" that the LT is correct in its domain > > of applicability based on actual [gasp!] information. > I'm sure you can prove LT are correct where they > are correct; evan such an idiot should be able to > manage such a task. > Have nothing against Lorentz and his transformations, > anyway. They demonstrate that t' <> t, which explodes Wozzie's "proof." So he has just admitted that he lied. > > > And - neither your absurd Shit nor even > > > whole of your moronic physics is a "major > > > part of science". > > > Sorry, trash. > > > > And all Wozzie has is profanity, lying and slander.  And > > inconsistency:  He says physics is information > I do. Even such a piece of lying shit as you > are can't lie always, of course. All Wozzie has is excrement. lying and denigration. > I do and it is. Only partly. A whole body of information. > Samely as whole science is. That's where Wozzie goes off the rails. He ignores the most important part. > And thus, none of your noble specializations could > mark you as an invincible expert about it. > You've just self-appointed yourself for that, > as expected from a DK idiot. Pot, kettle black :-) > > and then denies the information of physics. > Of course. What is inconsistent in denying > some information concocted by some religious > maniacs? Wozzie makes a biased judgment on the source of the information rather than the information itself. He says he has no problem with the LT, so does he accept that c + v = c? limit u' (as u > c) = (u + v)/(1 + uv/c^2) = c