Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 05:12:02 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: 5th Circuit Strikes Down Bump Stock Ban
References: <P8OcnfwhaeSXPiT-nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> <v4i2m6$30bm2$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-25D624.12335314062024@news.giganews.com> <v4ih8u$336lr$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-C652A7.15471614062024@news.giganews.com> <17d91fbd5fad865f$338100$533214$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com> <v4kgh9$3i0t8$1@dont-email.me> <17d9412e82a8a311$8843$3053472$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-13D763.17305115062024@news.giganews.com> <v4s1kl$1c3jr$5@dont-email.me> <atropos-B5B6C7.14031818062024@news.giganews.com> <v52jui$2qnl3$9@dont-email.me> <atropos-F5FE4B.18285620062024@news.giganews.com> <v52nbg$2v630$6@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 22:09:20 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-2F3DD8.22092020062024@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 26
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-xA7A5qiHMuiWI9dGJzKzksPLlaF8ofsKl5gbuHh+xorbV1tUy7u/S3x6SnH37rHqwX9sBOZaxTTHF2+!Z0aGyqoe8B1cAyrngBA06F6biB53mnZ5Br/ImY5FoGtC1OXjnl8jqxzRuFT1oHSE7/j27giLs7RK!DKg=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2442

In article <v52nbg$2v630$6@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> On 6/20/24 9:28 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <v52jui$2qnl3$9@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > 
> >> On 6/18/24 5:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article <v4s1kl$1c3jr$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:

> >>>> And how does using a bump stock differ from a fully automatic machine 
> >>>> gun?
> >>>
> >>> With a bump stock, for every round fired, a separate trigger pull occurs.
> >>
> >> Nope.  Both require ONE pull and pressure. You're using the specific
> >> language "a separate trigger pull occurs" because you KNOW you can't say
> >> a separate pull of the trigger.
> > 
> > I don't have to say either one because that's not the language of the
> > Act.

> Because you can't defend it.

I don't have to defend it because that's not the language of the Act.