Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniel70 Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho Subject: Re: From the Archives ..... Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 00:21:00 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 05 May 2024 16:20:59 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6577827f388a698540d69b973703d617"; logging-data="2003985"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+IaEmAKLQap/dwbGx8IYU2O3O+cShXJVY=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:6y/0f8HkePJRoQ7o8boLagMNx+Y= In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2564 The Doctor wrote on 5/5/24 9:37 pm: > In article , > Daniel70 wrote: >> The Doctor wrote on 5/5/24 8:02 am: >>> In article , >>> Daniel70 wrote: >>>> The Doctor wrote on 4/5/24 11:29 pm: >>>>> In article , Daniel70 >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Todays posting from the Archives comes from a thread called >>>>>> "Seasons 5 & 6: Comments" from back in July 1991 .... >>>>>> >>>>>> Quote At that point in the series, regeneration (it hadn't even >>>>>> been called that) was only done by the Doctor; it was something he >>>>>> built into the TARDIS (since at that point, the TARDIS was >>>>>> something he made). End Quote >>>>>> >>>>>> O.K. so for a long time it seemed that The Doctor could only >>>>>> regenerate whilst with-in The TARDIS, but, originally, was it >>>>>> actually suggested that Regeneration was *ONLY* possible because of >>>>>> what The Doctor had Built into HIS TARDIS Type 40?? >>>>> >>>>> Power of the Daleks. >>>>> >>>> What about it, a%e?? >>> >>> It would hold the explanation red-beard! >> >> .... which is, a%e, ..............?? > > How many regenerations are available. > > Did you not read MM's explanation? ..... and where is Mike's explanation, IN THIS THREAD, asswipe?? -- Daniel