Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniel70 Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho Subject: Re: Doctor Who: RTD in the Radio Times. Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 21:50:50 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:50:49 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bc3b23ee807acadd5f2431205913f471"; logging-data="1415633"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX194wbLGKxpiFTvhlHyK/CMihPlQpMsU1Sk=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:DO8mkgfBz9krGHO+PuR70s9NraY= In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2664 Hornplayer9599 wrote on 18/6/24 8:06 am: > On 6/17/2024 15:46, The Last Doctor wrote: >> >> I see Aggie still doesn’t accept how the BARB ratings work. > > How could he? It would upset his own little world where he is always > right if he did. I'm also convinced that he doesn't even quote > Doomcock (or any other YouTuber) correctly; rather he cherry-picks > what he wants to hear, and takes things out of context if it helps > stroke his own ego. (full disclosure, I subscribe to Doomcock and > Nerdrotic...so I can tell when he's misquoting them...which is > frequent regardless what Aggy claims.) > > Dunning-Kruger is very strong with him. > > I'm also convinced that Aggy couldn't run a used car dealership that > had only one car on the lot. > I have been wondering ... if Doomcock actually gave an episode of 'Doctor Who' a winning score (say 7+), would Aggy ALSO give the episode a winning score?? Hornplayer, if you've been looking at Doomcock for a while, what sort of opinion did Doomcock have of the Chris/JodieDoctor period?? (We all know Aggy hated it.) -- Daniel d say that the protesters' rights depend on history, geometry, etc. >> >> I'd say (and I'd be right) that no protester has rights to come onto my >> private property at all. I'm the only one who gets to decide who's >> allowed and who isn't. It's pretty much in the definition. >> > > They were in the street, not on McClosky's property. Bingo.