Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Kyonshi <gmkeros@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.toys.lego
Subject: Re: Lego 35mm camera
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 01:36:00 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <uvuvcu$38ogg$4@dont-email.me>
References: <eli$2404132309@qaz.wtf> <uvtqso$30tum$4@dont-email.me>
 <uvtvfu$tkt$4@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 01:40:14 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9befc85aa9c1cf11a21c17175fe7d838";
	logging-data="3432976"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18PIUeGRUtWWrM/2HdKP4UI"
User-Agent: Betterbird (Windows) Hamster/2.1.0.1548
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3WTtxIUh7WpFx96eS0R4LkF1//o=
In-Reply-To: <uvtvfu$tkt$4@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 1791

On 4/19/2024 4:35 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 4/19/24 08:09, Kyonshi wrote:
>> Ohhh, and functional as well?
> 
> I question how functional it is.
> 
> I'm sure that parts of the camera move and go through motions resembling 
> a function camera.
> 
> I don't believe it's a camera that could be used to take pictures.
> 
> 
> 

Well, that most likely depends what standards you put on that.
A picture most likely is perfectly possible. Use some normal lego bricks 
on the outside, and do the mechanics with Lego Technic parts. Should work.

A GOOD picture? I would assume is pretty unlikely.
It most likely is a gimmick, yes, perfectly possible to take a picture, 
but why would you do that to yourself?