Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniel70 Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho Subject: Re: Dave Yadallee denies reality, bears false witness Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 22:57:37 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 59 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 14:57:39 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e914e8b28351cdf137eccf15109fb290"; logging-data="3343895"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Li29Df1sp0LtH1PMROlfVs5Odep/8CKw=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:4RiME/1h+P0XJaQCiXnHHPLiJgE= In-Reply-To: Bytes: 3957 The Doctor wrote on 20/6/24 10:13 pm: > In article , The Last Doctor > wrote: >> The Slave to AI wrote: >>> >>> Liar! n fact, booth you and Solar Penguin and cut-and-lie >>> liars! >> >> That is just, as Daniel would call it, gobbledegook, Dave. >> >> You’re getting very angry about not what I believe, or what solar >> penguin believes, but about accepted Biblical scholarship. >> >> No-one with any education about or understanding of the history of >> Christianity believes that any of the New Testament was written by >> any of Jesus’ contemporaries, or anyone who knew him personally. >> >> Some of Paul’s letters (but not all) are believed to have been >> written by Paul who was effectively one of the second generation of >> apostles. Acts and Luke were written by one of Paul’s students. >> All the other writings are - well - later, and by other early >> Christians. >> >> None of that means that those books can’t have been divinely >> inspired or influenced. As I wrote previously in-thread (and you >> seem to have ignored because you were too focused on avoiding being >> caught in your own error): none of the above makes the New >> Testament any more or less relevant to Christians. It just means >> that none of the Bible was written by Jesus or by any direct >> witness to the words or acts described in it. Which is a simple >> statement of fact. >> >> It doesn’t make all the content false, though some of it is >> clearly apocryphal and some is contradictory of other parts, so it >> CANNOT all be literally true. When two writers flat out contradict >> each other, at least one of them MUST be wrong. >> >> Anyone who doesn’t understand that the Bible was written by men, >> after the death of Jesus, by people who never met him, and that it >> is not completely consistent, is uneducated. Anyone who refuses to >> believe it, when shown, is frankly a deluded idiot. >> >> But back to the point where you started this: where in the Bible >> does it say that Jesus (not his followers, or ancient Jewish >> priests laying down the laws of men) - that Jesus condemns >> homosexuals (well, physical acts that are homosexual in nature - >> the concept as such didn’t exist back then)? >> >> That was your claim. What is its Biblical basis? >> >> Hint: You need a Book, Chapter and Verses that attribute this >> sentiment to Jesus. > > I did you cut and lie freaks! Gobble-de-gook AGAIN is unable AGAIN to answer a question specifically asked of HIM!! ..... HOW UNUSUAL ...... *NOT* !! -- Daniel