Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan ) Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: YASID Date: 21 May 2024 19:19:39 GMT Organization: loft Lines: 71 Message-ID: References: <69mn4jppd29is4apku7o4njitkt5cpkhm6@4ax.com> X-Trace: individual.net YiaPHOElZW51NJR91IHnzQTecjKcNZ6ampqD8eyKhq1EXg964L X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:w09DB5d97CYrzCgk45RebMxMvIA= sha256:LU7UhKnmBk+jTnPcqD2v1FegwpY8GLeAQuvYa9aZ3C8= X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001) Bytes: 3525 In article , William Hyde wrote: >Ted Nolan wrote: >> In article <69mn4jppd29is4apku7o4njitkt5cpkhm6@4ax.com>, >> Chris Duck wrote: >>> Thanks! >>> >>> On Mon, 20 May 2024 17:22:22 -0400, William Hyde > wrote: >>> >>>> technovelist wrote: >>>>> Anyone have a reference for a short story in which a famous composer >>> is "brought back from the dead" >>>>> by giving a completely nonmusical person a "personality transplant" >>> (my term, I'm not sure what it >>>>> was called in the story)? The twist is that the "revived composer" >>> realizes just before they take >>>>> away the personality transplant is that he is the critics' version of >>> the composer, a complete hack >>>>> with no actual original ability. >>>>> >>>>> I read this in a short story collection. It might be James Blish or >>> Arthur C. Clarke but I haven't >>>>> seen any titles that ring a bell in their bibliographies. >>>> >>>> It is "A work of art" by James Blish. The composer was Richard Strauss. >>>> >>>> Robert Mills edited an anthology in which authors were invited to submit >>>> their best stories. This was Blish's choice. >>>> >>>> William Hyde >>>> >> >> That's interesting, in that it certainly doesn't sound as good as say, >> "Surface Tensin". > >It's a complex story about identity, and while the context is distinctly >secular, I think it resonates with some of the religious issues which >form part of Blish's fiction. > >Also, it's quite an original story, and the twist at the end is nice, >the kind you should have foreseen, but probably did not. I can't imagine >any other SF author writing it. > > >In addition, he seems to have known a fair amount about Strauss, and >this gave him a chance to look at the composer's work from the >perspective of the reconstructed Strauss. The latter does not like some >aspects of the original's work, perhaps giving Blish a chance to air >longstanding irritations. > >If I were to write a similar story about Dvorak, for example, I'd have >the reconstructed Anton wonder how he could have marred so great a work >as this eighth symphony with such a slapdash ending (as I understand it, >the musical world somehow disagrees with me about this, perhaps as much >as I disagree with Blish about Strauss. How inexplicable!) > > > > >William Hyde > Thanks! I haven't read the story (obviously), and from the initial description, it sounded like a "gimmick" story like the one where Asimov had Shakespeare fail a class on Shakespeare... -- columbiaclosings.com What's not in Columbia anymore..