Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniel70 Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho Subject: Re: Dave Yadallee denies reality, bears false witness Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 18:16:30 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 10:16:30 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f6c0960f59a0899ba11fa7b8ea25df85"; logging-data="899166"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ykwxFYrLZuC8DrhajI6lE3TjeTqcKfsw=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:KFIuxJTemBeX2Un82qSZgNcxIZc= In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2641 Hornplayer9599 wrote on 24/6/24 12:15 am: > On 6/23/2024 08:58, Daniel70 wrote: > >>>> I'm guessing Mike is a hell of a lot closer to Logic than YOU, >>>> Gobble-de-gook, are!! >>> >>> Wrongo, Dannyboy! >> >> Proof, Gobble-de-gook, Proof!! >> >> And have I just worked out why Gobble-de-gook complains/points out >> when anybody Snips the stuff that the reasonable poster is not >> responding to. >> >> That give Gobble-de-gook the ability to claim that the answer to the >> non-Answered Question is/was with-in that part of the message that is >> trimmed/snipped. >> >> It never is .... but he can/does make the claim!! > > He can claim all he wants.  However, anyone can go back up the thread > and read the original post(s) that are not snipped.  He seems to forget > about that, unless he's going to claim that people go back and snip/trim > every...single...line of every...single...post in a thread to erase his > non-existent answer so nobody can read what he didn't say anyway. > That would be correct ..... *IF* the reader were reading the posts in a threaded display ..... but guess who *DOESN'T* have his display set up in a Threaded display format!! He just reads the posts one post after another post .... so once the information is snipped from a reply, Gobble-de-gook is unable to locate/read it!! -- Daniel