Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 17:49:53 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v5a5a1$smd5$6@i2pn2.org>
References: <v598l4$c4if$1@dont-email.me> <v59p13$smd5$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v5a4qc$h08n$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 21:49:53 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="940453"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <v5a4qc$h08n$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2920
Lines: 59

On 6/23/24 5:41 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 6/23/2024 1:20 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 6/23/24 9:40 AM, olcott wrote:
>>> _DDD()
>>> [00002172] 55               push ebp
>>> [00002173] 8bec             mov ebp,esp
>>> [00002175] 6872210000       push 00002172 ; push DDD
>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff       call 000015d2 ; call HHH0
>>> [0000217f] 83c404           add esp,+04
>>> [00002182] 5d               pop ebp
>>> [00002183] c3               ret
>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>>>
>>> According to the semantics of the x86 programming language
>>> when DDD correctly emulated by H0 calls H0(DDD) this call
>>> cannot possibly return.
>>>
>>> Likewise according to the semantics of arithmetic for
>>> decimal integers: 2 + 3 = 5.
>>>
>>> Anyone disagreeing with these two statements is WRONG.
>>>
>>
>> NOw, if you REALLY mean just can H0 simulate this input to a final 
>> state, the answer is WHO CARES.
>>
>> But I will put out a few comments on errors in your presentation\.
>>
>> First, if you ONLY have the bytes presented, then the answer becomes 
>> trivial, as H0 HAS to stop emulating when it gets to the call 
>> instruction, as there is no data at address 000015d2 defined to simulate.
>>
> 
> What a God damned liar.
> https://liarparadox.org/HH0_(DDD)_Full_Trace.pdf
> 

Which begins its trace at main, not DDD:

 From Source Listing:
_main()
[000020b3] 55     push ebp


 From the beginnig of the trace:

machine   stack     stack     machine    assembly
address   address   data      code       language
========  ========  ========  =========  =============
[000020b3][00103680][00000000] 55          push ebp

So it isn't the trace of HHH0 correctly simulating DDD

So, who is the God Damned Liar?

I told you this last time you posted it.

I guess reading what you are talking about is too hard for you.

LIAR.