Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:16:04 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 09:16:04 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="79eb3ee761a59ddbf8483dd98c21e45b"; logging-data="3221407"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/XNwoOZqCAh1YVg8VMYiUV" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:qaVGt1OrfybwBDTxZ0W+jtxWo/k= Bytes: 2782 On 2024-06-20 15:04:35 +0000, olcott said: > On 6/20/2024 9:42 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2024-06-20 05:15:37 +0000, olcott said: >> >>> On 6/20/2024 12:04 AM, Mikko wrote: >> >>>> Sitll inclear whether you know what "termination analyzer" means. >> >>> I really don't care what you believe. >>> It is not about belief. >>> It is about correct reasoning. >> >> No, it is not. It is about language maintenance. If you cannot present >> your reasoning in Common Language it does not matter whether your >> reasoning is correct. > > I cannot possibly present my reasoning in a convincing way > to people that have already made up their mind and closed it > thus fail to trace through each step of this reasoning looking > for an error and finding none. If you can't convince the reviewers of a journal that your article is well thought and well written you cannot get it published in a respected journal. -- Mikko