Path: ...!news.nobody.at!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!cleanfeed4-a.proxad.net!nnrp1-1.free.fr!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy From: =?UTF-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane?= CARPENTIER Subject: Re: Why Unicode is Shit References: <17d8f953df0055c6$92217$3210899$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <666ccf64$0$7511$426a74cc@news.free.fr> Organization: Mulots' Killer User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: 15 Jun 2024 12:43:44 GMT Lines: 32 Message-ID: <666d8c80$0$3286$426a74cc@news.free.fr> NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Jun 2024 14:43:44 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 78.201.248.7 X-Trace: 1718455424 news-2.free.fr 3286 78.201.248.7:33864 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Bytes: 2071 Le 15-06-2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit : > On 14 Jun 2024 23:16:52 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > >>> Now, 32-bits is an awful lot >> >> Yep. >> >>> but it's not FUTURE PROOF. >> >> When will it become saturated? > > It won’t. You didn't understood my questions (you kept only one, but there were many related questions). I'm not asking you or anyone having any clue about unicode. I know the answers and he doesn't. So, I'm asking him to answer me to have fun because his answers would either be stupid or show how he doesn't know anything. Now, if you want to answer seriously, why not, but it's less funny. You can't tell it'll never been saturated because never is a really long time and you have no way to predict the future. New needs can arrise you don't know about. But if we take all of the past characters and the actual ones, we have a lot of places (I don't put the numbers because it would spoil his answers). They really did a great job, unlike him I know why, and I want him to show more of his lack of knowledge. -- Si vous avez du temps à perdre : https://scarpet42.gitlab.io