Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Last Doctor Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho Subject: Re: Dave Yadallee denies reality, bears false witness Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:10:22 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 69 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:10:22 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e3b987a908c3b192c6175518156a7b27"; logging-data="1702881"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18cgf+FJ0r2tn0g9T0+Tx5W" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:vsQXVf2h/iLzKnmuV1InJPRydUU= sha1:BWLxIGV0qFyMcRdB4wL2OqkepJM= Bytes: 3856 The Doctor wrote: > In article , > The Last Doctor wrote: >> The Doctor wrote: >>> The Last Doctor wrote: >>>> The Doctor wrote: >>>>> Hornplayer9599 wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Now. Prove your Bible claim!! >>>>> >>>>> Already did Cut and Lie Hornplayer. >>>> >>>> Well EVERYBODY missed it Dave. >>>> >>>> Book, Chapter and Verse again where Jesus condemns homosexuals please. >>>> >>>> (And remember, the words must be attributed to Jesus. Not anyone else >>>> including his bestest servants from long after his death. Because that was >>>> your claim.) >>>> >>>> Because none of us remember your “proof”. >>>> >>> >>> I will reiterate at some point. >> >> You have to iterate before reiterating, Dave. >> >> And why do we have to wait until “at some point“? Surely you could flick >> back through your own posting history on this thread and find the post with >> your reference? A matter of minutes to feel good, and put me in the awkward >> position of admitting I was wrong and apologising to you? I’d have thought >> you’d jump at the chance. >> >> Unless, of course, there’s no such reference … then “at some >> point” would >> be good for you wouldn’t it, as you parlay it into “never” and keep on >> lying … > > Lies MM! No lies, as you proceeded to demonstrate by evading again … > Now logic Join these dots! [SNIP enormous copy paste from Acts detailing the conversion of Saul and words spoken by Saul, that contain no evidence that Jesus spoke about homosexual acts - in fact contain no quotation of the teachings of Jesus]. The quote is removed because it does not address your claims. I’ve joined the dots. I’ve already stated that I know that Acts claims that Saul was converted by a visitation from the dead Jesus, and that Saul/Paul later condemned homosexuality in Romans. But those are Paul’s words. You said Jesus condemned homosexuals. Jesus is the source you need. Not Paul. Or are you (finally) conceding that you agree that it is NOT written that Jesus condemned homosexuals, but that the Levitic laws of the Jews did, and that some of Jesus’ followers later did? Because not of that was ever in dispute. The question was where you read that Jesus (not Paul, Jesus) condemned homosexuals? > Let us if MM and SP and make the corect deductible logical conclusion. I’m not being taxed on my conclusions so can’t claim them as a deductible. -- “Most of the Universe is knackered, babes.” - The Doctor