Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 18:34:13 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 34 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 01:34:14 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="30c92b316077fe98558b44dd129a1438"; logging-data="607217"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18t8GiUizlXoMYFF3X/YDIK" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:KFQknD7btHTMnZmmcDBVyYdTxb4= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2274 On 6/23/2024 5:58 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 6/23/24 6:45 PM, olcott wrote: >> >> You know what the freak I was talking from prior >> discussions unless your brain is so damaged that >> you can't remember anything from one post to the next. >> >> In the case that you affirm that your brain >> this damaged then I humbly apologize. >> > > > No, you don't know what you are talking about. > So you insist on lying about this verified fact? _DDD() [00002172] 55 push ebp [00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call H0(DDD) [0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04 [00002182] 5d pop ebp [00002183] c3 ret Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183] According to the semantics of the x86 programming language when DDD correctly emulated by H0 calls H0(DDD) this call cannot possibly return. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer