Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 11:48:39 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 11:48:39 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="67658"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2354 Lines: 10 Am Fri, 14 Jun 2024 21:39:50 -0500 schrieb olcott: > The key aspect of all of this is that if the halting problem is correct > then truth itself is fundamentally broken. Since truth itself cannot > possibly be fundamentally broken it must be fallible human understanding > of truth that is actually broken. I've got bad news for you, and you're a century late. Gödel proved that not all true statements are provable. It sure would have been nice. -- joes