Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts?
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 13:49:51 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <v576cg$3soh6$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v56n8h$3pr25$1@dont-email.me> <v56ntj$onl3$7@i2pn2.org>
 <v56ps2$3q4ea$1@dont-email.me> <v56sk3$p1du$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v56tfv$3ql1v$2@dont-email.me> <v570n5$onl4$11@i2pn2.org>
 <v571lc$3rrgk$1@dont-email.me> <v57603$onl3$12@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 20:49:52 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="52f855e26d0a069f32049d753a1d455d";
	logging-data="4088358"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19kJJxUI6XViJKd7LLTKE67"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:biiaebBk/APXT4oFH5i6JwX0j1I=
In-Reply-To: <v57603$onl3$12@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3088

On 6/22/2024 1:43 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 6/22/24 1:29 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 6/22/2024 12:13 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 6/22/24 12:18 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>
>>>> void DDD()
>>>> {
>>>>    HHH0(DDD);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> The input to HHH0(DDD) includes itself.
>>>> The input to HHH1(DDD) DOES NOT include itself.
>>>>
>>>> It is stipulated that correct emulation is defined by the
>>>> semantics of the x86 programming language and nothing else.
>>>
>>> And thus, your emulation traces show that your "Simulating Halt 
>>> Deciders" do not do a "Correct Simulation" 
>>
>> Apparently your ADD preventing you from paying close attention
>> to ALL of my words.
>>
>> *Function names adapted to correspond to my updated paper*
>>
>> void DDD()
>> {
>>    H0(DDD);
>> }
>>
>> *When we stipulate that the only measure of a correct*
>> *emulation is the semantics of the x86 programming language*
>>
>> *When we stipulate that the only measure of a correct*
>> *emulation is the semantics of the x86 programming language*
>>
>> *When we stipulate that the only measure of a correct*
>> *emulation is the semantics of the x86 programming language*
>>
>> *When we stipulate that the only measure of a correct*
>> *emulation is the semantics of the x86 programming language*
>>
>> *When we stipulate that the only measure of a correct*
>> *emulation is the semantics of the x86 programming language*
>>
>> then we see that when DDD is correctly emulated by H0 that
>> its call to H0(DDD) cannot possibly return.
> 
> Since your H0 has never demonstrated that is actually DOES the correct 
> simulation per your stipulation, 

Liar

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer