Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 ---Boilerplate Reply Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 08:11:48 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 08:11:48 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1221533"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2118 Lines: 17 Am Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:22:08 -0500 schrieb olcott: > On 6/25/2024 3:31 PM, joes wrote: >> Am Fri, 21 Jun 2024 12:22:04 -0500 schrieb olcott: >>> When there is no mapping from the finite string x86 machine language >>> input to H(D,D) to the behavior of D(D) then H(D,D) IS NOT being asked >>> about the behavior of D(D). >> It means that H can't do the mapping, i.e. it is not simulating >> correctly. >> It does a different map that doesn't fit its specification. > No that is incorrect. D correctly simulated by every H that can possibly > exist does not have the same behavior of any directly executed D(D) that > halts. H1 simulates D the same way it would actually behave. Is that wrong? -- Man kann mit dunklen Zahlen nicht rechnen. Für die eigentliche Mathematik sind sie vollkommen nutzlos. --Wolfgang Mückenheim