Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connectionsPath: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 21:52:44 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 66
Message-ID:
References:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 04:52:45 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="422dd2162c45ab1a09b084523bb5ca66";
logging-data="1435386"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+csKsCkLU6Ldx3Z7lHtXY1"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:uC9rACC3WmlKV/7lKc+MnojwlDM=
In-Reply-To:
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4081
On 6/24/2024 9:48 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 6/24/24 10:38 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 6/24/2024 9:26 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 6/24/24 10:21 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 6/24/2024 9:02 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 6/24/24 9:55 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *We can get to that as soon as you reverse your lie*
>>>>>> *We can get to that as soon as you reverse your lie*
>>>>>> *We can get to that as soon as you reverse your lie*
>>>>>
>>>>> You still haven't shown where I lied, on where you don't like what
>>>>> I say.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You said that D correctly simulated by H must
>>>>>> have the behavior of the directly executed D(D).
>>>>>
>>>>> Right, the steps that H sees are IDENTIAL to the steps of the
>>>>> directly executed D(D) until H stops its simulation,
>>>>>
>>>>> NOT ONE DIFFERENCE.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Honest mistake or liar?
>>>>
>>>> The directly executed D(D) has identical behavior to
>>>> D correctly simulated by H1
>>>> *the call from D to H(D,D) returns*
>>>>
>>>> This is not the same behavior as
>>>> D correctly simulated by H
>>>> *the call from D to H(D,D) DOES NOT return*
>>>>
>>>
>>> And what instruction did H's simulation differ from the direct
>>> executions trace?
>>>
>>
>> D correctly simulated by H
>> *the call from D to H(D,D) DOES NOT return*
>
> Which isn't "Behavior of the input"
>
> The "not happening" of something that could have happened except that
> the processing was stoped is NOT behavior.
>
>>
>> D correctly simulated by H1 --- Identical to D(D)
>> *the call from D to H(D,D) returns*
>>
>
> Right, and it contains ALL of the behavior of the correct simulation of
> D by H, plus more.
>
> H doesn't see DIFFERENT behavior, just LESS, and that differnce isn't
> due to the input, but due to H.
These are not the same behaviors
*the call from D to H(D,D) CANNOT POSSIBLY return*
*the call from D to H(D,D) returns*
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer