Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!news.szaf.org!inka.de!mips.inka.de!.POSTED.localhost!not-for-mail From: Christian Weisgerber Newsgroups: sci.lang Subject: Re: Crus, Crures (quod pectus, quod crura tibi, quod bracchia vellis) Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 19:00:02 -0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <87jziverlu.fsf@parhasard.net> <87frtjeok7.fsf@parhasard.net> Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 19:00:02 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: lorvorc.mips.inka.de; posting-host="localhost:::1"; logging-data="12284"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@mips.inka.de" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (FreeBSD) Bytes: 1814 Lines: 21 On 2024-06-11, Antonio Marques wrote: > Portuguese _perna_ (whence?) From Latin _perna_, cognate with German _Ferse_ 'heel' as well as words in Greek and Indo-Iranian, according to Wiktionary. Not even English and German can agree on the leg words. "Leg" is borrowed from Old Norse. German "Bein" is cognate with "bone" (and in various compounds still retains a meaning 'bone', e.g. "Gebeinhaus" 'ossuary'). English "shank" refers to the lower leg but is cognate (+ diminutive) with German "Schenkel" 'thigh'. English "thigh" had an Old High German cognate, but it didn't survive into Modern German. German "Wade", which refers to the back part of the lower leg, is a Germanic word but without English cognate. I wonder whether the anatomical differences between plantigrade humans and some of our digitigrade and unguligrade domestic animals are to blame. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de