Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_A_simulating_halt_decider_applied_to_the_The_Peter_?= =?UTF-8?Q?Linz_Turing_Machine_description_=E2=9F=A8=C4=A4=E2=9F=A9_--_key_d?= =?UTF-8?Q?etails?= Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 16:17:27 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 42 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2024 23:17:28 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f629d257ac302b24ac32e99a4ff4b1b3"; logging-data="67869"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+fKkpL7xP+CFkUsEVvdcWO" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:ov+1Q+0/9TGLsZIXJIt6ck9FC9I= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3784 On 6/3/2024 3:01 PM, joes wrote: > Am Mon, 03 Jun 2024 14:00:04 -0500 schrieb olcott: >> On 6/3/2024 10:16 AM, Mikko wrote: >>> On 2024-06-03 12:36:00 +0000, olcott said: >>>> On 6/3/2024 3:01 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>> On 2024-06-02 13:21:56 +0000, olcott said: >>>>>> On 6/2/2024 2:42 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>>>> On 2024-06-01 19:26:55 +0000, olcott said: >>>>>>>> On 6/1/2024 1:52 PM, joes wrote: >>>>>>>>> Am Sat, 01 Jun 2024 09:37:01 -0500 schrieb olcott: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/2024 2:52 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-05-31 15:35:18 +0000, olcott said: > >> I am so sure that I must be right that I do not notice any actual > mistakes. > FTFY. > >> The only "mistake" that anyone ever pointed out is essentially "that's >> not the way that I memorized it". > No, your mistake is the contradictory requirements for H: > The way that the halting problem is conventionally understood is that H must correctly answer yes or no to an input that contradicts both answers. That is the exact same incorrect question as this: Is this sentence: "this sentence is not true" true or false? >> When the behavior of DD correctly simulated by HH is not the same as the >> behavior of the directly executed DD(DD) >> they assume the simulation must be wrong even though it it an easily >> verified fact that it is correct. > That's not an assumption. That's the definition of simulation: doing > exactly the same thing as the direct execution, which may be infinite > recursion. But then H is not a decider. > -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer