Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 21:07:51 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: 5th Circuit Strikes Down Bump Stock Ban
References: <atropos-13D763.17305115062024@news.giganews.com> <v4s1kl$1c3jr$5@dont-email.me> <atropos-B5B6C7.14031818062024@news.giganews.com> <v4t1nu$1ig6v$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-5889D5.18473418062024@news.giganews.com> <v4tfnl$1ons5$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-C71DF5.19385218062024@news.giganews.com> <v4v8jq$23o16$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-A285B6.12133319062024@news.giganews.com> <v4vh5f$258cf$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-35247F.16282619062024@news.giganews.com> <s6077jpsl679hmse4jdbsf9eg38a9pf6qt@4ax.com> <v52ki8$2qv7o$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-0C76E1.18474220062024@news.giganews.com> <v52n7s$2v630$4@dont-email.me> <atropos-4D6141.22022320062024@news.giganews.com> <v54t46$3bnc4$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-9EEF71.12373225062024@news.giganews.com> <v5feln$1ns3d$4@dont-email.me> <atropos-977AD3.15510125062024@news.giganews.com> <v5fulk$1uphg$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-6A61A6.20104425062024@news.giganews.com> <v5hv3j$2aohk$2@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 14:05:26 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-CEDF19.14052626062024@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 38
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-3rW1PcYizfusT+g0zj5YXz4FgufvlP/3BXdQnN47c4IRcUA2S9GUEdZ/kXyyUW0QXYwN7NVFqJ5BCIl!gcf2qgQq0egBZv27wkjphZYIfR/J8Iz9uDMl+5L3YxvveiDNjbhpUotpRaAMd9UY+LSILV1UCEit!C5I=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3294

In article <v5hv3j$2aohk$2@dont-email.me>,
 moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

> On 6/25/2024 11:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <v5fulk$1uphg$1@dont-email.me>,
> >   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 6/25/2024 6:51 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article <v5feln$1ns3d$4@dont-email.me>,
> >>>    moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 6/25/2024 3:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>> In article <v54t46$3bnc4$2@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>     moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>> What official verbiage defines "a function of the trigger"?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Just that: completion of a full cycle of function.
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>> If it's different for full-auto, why not for bump-stocks?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The definition is not different for full-auto. A full cycle of function
> >>>>> of the trigger with an automatic rifle just produces different results
> >>>>> than it does with a semi-auto.
> >>>>
> >>>> But bump-stock results are the *same* as full-auto. Your consecration
> >>>> of the almighty trigger would allow me, e.g., to affix a vibrating
> >>>> rubber "finger" to my semi-auto...
> >>>
> >>> Yep. Or just pull it really fast yourself.
> >>
> >> Hey, what about eliminating the trigger, like BLACK SUNDAY (1977)?
> > 
> > That flechette weapon did indeed have a trigger.
> 
> You mean a 'button'?

The button only closed the circuit on the mechanism.