Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:21:38 +0000 From: BTR1701 Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Kamala Outright Lies About Women's Basketball Brackets References: <17d4370a814a9fe0$40$3919488$c2d58868@news.newsdemon.com> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X) Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:19:16 -0700 Message-ID: Lines: 78 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-VyZJDIe/9zxb1TNXt37jzXhEqSe3ECBbaYBd4lbmMoVRVCHc+90O/t7a+W/5x1yIPzk5WJVgOB/4VB5!FvAzKM0UmYxoiJImssKBbS8dVp/zNieZFmPFpt+oJJUgLjmR5Lfk+KN5nHdGwqsSXzX2yHPtEguw!fNg= X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 4525 In article , FPP wrote: > On 6/20/24 10:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > > In article , FPP > > wrote: > > > >> On 6/20/24 9:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>> In article , FPP > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 6/18/24 4:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>>>> In article , FPP > >>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>> And you think NOT commenting on a convicted felon and adjudicated > >>>>>>>>>> rapist and fraud says something good about you? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Irrelevant. You claimed I did comment, so Mr. > >>>>>>>>> I-Never-Post-Something- > >>>>>>>>> Without-Proof has painted himself into a corner yet again. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Not at all. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> So post the proof. Show me where I commented on Trump's potential > >>>>>>> sentencing details. Betcha won't because you can't. > >>>>> > >>>>>> You never mention Trump. That's the point. > >>>>> > >>>>> And yet you claimed I did comment on Trump. > >>>>> > >>>>> So that would be... wait for it... a lie. > >>>>> > >>>> Got me there, klown! I'm done for now... > >>> > >>> At least you admitted it. Of course that also makes all the other times > >>> you said you never lie a... wait for it... also a lie. > >>>> > >>>>> "Always" and "Never" statements are frequently used by people when they > >>>>> are arguing in order to emphasize or illustrate the merits of their > >>>>> position. > >>> > >>> Oh, so now colloquialisms are okay again? Weird how we're never allowed > >>> to stray from the literal unless it's necessary to get Effa out of a jam. > >>> > >> Always were. We all use them every day. > >> You just used "never", didn't you, moron? If you were sticking to your > >> guns you NEVER would use the word never in this context. > >> > >> Only nit-pickers, like you, use them as an excuse. > >> Stupid much? > > > > Of course even granting hyperbole for the sake of an Effa win on Usenet > > today, that *still* doesn't get you out of this jam: > > > > "Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again?" > > > > In which you reference alleged statements on Trump's sentencing that I > > never made. No amount of pretend appeals to hyperbole are gonna get you > > out of this lie, Effa. > > > > And you never will. That's the point... the leader of your party is a > rapist, and you tried to dance around the wording of that too. > > A rapist. And you made excuses for him... Nice dodge, but here it is again. Maybe you'll actually address it this time: Of course even granting hyperbole for the sake of an Effa win on Usenet today, that *still* doesn't get you out of this jam: "Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again?" In which you reference alleged statements on Trump's sentencing that I never made. No amount of pretend appeals to hyperbole are gonna get you out of this lie, Effa.