Path: ...!news.nobody.at!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!news.burmester.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Martin Burmester <martin@burmester.org>
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: INN batches over multiple intermediates
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 13:13:25 +0200
Organization: burmester.org
Message-ID: <v4jt0l$a8er$1@blackbox.home.burmester.org>
References: <v4hqb5$2v6ms$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 11:13:25 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: blackbox.home.burmester.org;
	logging-data="336347"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xs3.de"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mihVSjSHKRiNjYhuUHqDc1gtsdw=
In-Reply-To: <v4hqb5$2v6ms$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: de-DE
Bytes: 1625
Lines: 18

Hi,

Am 14.06.2024 um 18:08 schrieb Kyonshi:
> One question we just came across when thinking about this and we 
> couldn't find an answer:
> Assuming we have two INN2 installations on machines more than one hop 
> away from one another, how would be the best way to move a batch from 
> Machine 1 to Machine 3, without an installation of INN on Machine 2 
> between them.
> Would this have to be defined in the send-uucp.cf of INN or rather in 
> the port/sys settings of uucp itself?

I came across this question a few years ago. This would have to be done 
in send-uucp. But as far as I know send-uucp does not support this. You 
would have to dive into the the source code of send-uucp and implement it.

Cheers,
Martin