Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jim Pennino Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 15:05:10 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <2222c43775e520228c1cf40786424435@www.novabbs.com> <06telk-jcsn.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <02797b9bc51252f1f2d1cca6e42735e3@www.novabbs.com> <0sd0mk-q79h1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> Injection-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 00:16:04 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d175af432983231444cc080c7ce3e9a9"; logging-data="1645339"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+snUCNUOFcU2cfyXlapCSG" User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-113-lowlatency (x86_64)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:FeyXaR+7j7Ol9Qt5mcDYtCg/Pqg= Bytes: 2011 David Canzi wrote: > On 7/9/24 14:58, Jim Pennino wrote: >> David Canzi wrote: >>> On 7/3/24 20:38, bertietaylor wrote: >>>> The nonsense that is e=mcc cannot be glorified with the exponential >>>> operator and an extra letter. >>>> Arindam's contraction to e=mcc shows his disdain. >>> >>> Arindam has used this same disdainful gesture on his own >>> formula that he offers as a superior alternative to E=mcc >> >> This is Arindam. > > It isn't always necessary to say so. True, it is pretty obvious to anyone paying attention, but most people don't pay any attention to your posts, Aridam.