Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 23:25:58 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <FlDiO.56506$GVTf.837@fx01.ams4>
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
In-Reply-To: <FlDiO.56506$GVTf.837@fx01.ams4>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 10
Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!s1-1.netnews.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2024 21:25:58 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 894
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17e00b5e9fa1150e$318$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 1234

W dniu 07.07.2024 o 23:05, Paul B. Andersen pisze:

> Those who insist that time is absolute (as in Newtonian Mechanics)
> will obviously claim that all equal synchronised clocks will
> stay synchronous irrespective of how they are moved relative
> to each other.

What an impudent slander. But what to
expect from relativistic scum.