Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 14:11:42 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <9oTvw4-YSIPb1dubtdBwcc_MeX8@jntp> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 57 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 12:11:41 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2624 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17e176062e29eb1e$30218$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 3030 W dniu 12.07.2024 o 14:03, Paul.B.Andersen pisze: > Den 11.07.2024 14:56, skrev Richard Hachel: >> Le 11/07/2024 à 14:36, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit : >>> Den 11.07.2024 02:02, skrev Richard Hachel: >> >>>>> Yet B ages 9.18 years while A ages 22.63 y. >>> >>> Which is the only result SR can give. > > What's the point with writing 5 responses where you don't > address anything in the post you are responding to? > >>> Quite. >>> We know that your "theory" is falsified and gives the wrong results. > >> No. Not MINE. > > May I remind you: > > | Den 27.03.2024 07:23, skrev Richard Hachel: > |> Le 26/03/2024 à 21:45, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit : > |>> > |>> Are you claiming that the real speed of the protons in the LHC is > |>>   Vr = 6927⋅c ? > |> > |> Absolutely. > |> > |> That's what I said. > > | Den 27.03.2024 07:23, skrev Richard Hachel: > |> Le 26/03/2024 à 21:45, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit : > |>> > |>> You are claiming that the protons are going around the ≈ 27 km ring > |>> ≈ 78 million times per second. > |>> The real value is ≈ 11.25 thousand times per second. > |> > |> CERN physicists are doing their job. > |> We have accustomed them to working at classic relativistic speed. > |> So it makes sense that they find the speed they expect. > |> I tell them that the proton rotates 78 million times per second, > > > It is experimentally proved that no accelerator would work > if charged particles didn't behave _exactly_ as predicted by SR. A very impudent lie, as expected from relativistic scum. > Some of the experimental evidence that fail to falsify SR: > https://paulba.no/paper/index.html And in the meantime in the real world - forbidden by your insane church improper clocks keep measuring improper t'=t in improper seconds.