Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Python Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 15:14:27 +0200 Organization: CCCP Lines: 41 Message-ID: References: <668baa12$2$3285$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <17e03e2defe3f3e1$430$498727$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <17e03f08335368e7$431$498727$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:14:27 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1867e14ac94e18ddfeef61a839a68877"; logging-data="936155"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18TM/gI88i9ajQoM9aYr0bc" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:7xhilzRRX1Jut9VFHX1/ZS3zT00= In-Reply-To: <17e03f08335368e7$431$498727$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2694 Le 08/07/2024 à 15:12, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > W dniu 08.07.2024 o 15:05, Python pisze: >> Le 08/07/2024 à 14:57, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>> W dniu 08.07.2024 o 13:11, Python pisze: >>>> Le 08/07/2024 à 10:57, J. J. Lodder a écrit : >>>>> Paul B. Andersen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Den 04.07.2024 15:30, skrev Richard Hachel: >>>>>>> Langevin's paradox. >>>>>>> The Langevin paradox is a very serious criticism against the >>>>>>> theory of >>>>>>> relativity. >>>>>> >>>>>> Langvin's paradox is another name of the "twin paradox". >>>>>> In 1911 Langevin gave an example of said "paradox". >>>>> >>>>> Yes, but the French are often excessively chauvinistic. >>>> >>>> Lengrand (aka Hachel) is. A quite ridiculous one. Most French >>>> are not, obviously (look at the election results :-) ) >>>> >>>>> Nothing is to be taken seriously >>>>> unless a French name can be tagged onto it. >>>> >>>> Fact it that the twin paradox has been pointed out first >>> >>> >>> Neither in France, nor in other countries, neither >>> between [Scientists] nor >>> his enemies anyone noticed, that [Special Relativity] >>> was obviously inconsistent. >> >> Simply because it is not. The demented mumble of a senile >> Polish crank does not matter you know? > > Oh yes, it is. I've pointed dirtectly You've pointed nothing but illustrations of your stupidity.