Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k)
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 16:54:36 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <v6k82e$1hcdb$1@dont-email.me>
References: <cel9lk-q9sg.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
 <cmaclk-qbdk.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
 <d005f9ab78865db97d173eb5638c14a3@www.novabbs.com>
 <leim3oFq4asU1@mid.individual.net>
 <2222c43775e520228c1cf40786424435@www.novabbs.com>
 <06telk-jcsn.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
 <e33f14d8977190b22c067ce4ca07175e@www.novabbs.com>
 <pr4glk-gsip.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
 <02797b9bc51252f1f2d1cca6e42735e3@www.novabbs.com>
 <v6k04b$1g2g6$1@dont-email.me> <0sd0mk-q79h1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 22:54:39 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="87beb5e40eda3d5ef80a8da5f32a3153";
	logging-data="1618347"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/3uQ9Q6eozu42Bs1Sn5EFV"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:u6jEiX6T1y5Tyo2fxW9PmH38jpQ=
In-Reply-To: <0sd0mk-q79h1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 1942

On 7/9/24 14:58, Jim Pennino wrote:
> David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>> On 7/3/24 20:38, bertietaylor wrote:
>>> The nonsense that is e=mcc cannot be glorified with the exponential
>>> operator and an extra letter.
>>> Arindam's contraction to e=mcc shows his disdain.
>>
>> Arindam has used this same disdainful gesture on his own
>> formula that he offers as a superior alternative to E=mcc
> 
> This is Arindam.

It isn't always necessary to say so.