Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jim Pennino Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 11:58:42 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 14 Message-ID: <0sd0mk-q79h1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> References: <2222c43775e520228c1cf40786424435@www.novabbs.com> <06telk-jcsn.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <02797b9bc51252f1f2d1cca6e42735e3@www.novabbs.com> Injection-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 21:01:04 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ab47162ea50e43cc2ea91a24f275d8a3"; logging-data="1582927"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/jB+YkLrqdPIJ2sIBT2Lv0" User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-113-lowlatency (x86_64)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:S6cU/umoam4H566TWGad02fa2vU= Bytes: 1715 David Canzi wrote: > On 7/3/24 20:38, bertietaylor wrote: >> The nonsense that is e=mcc cannot be glorified with the exponential >> operator and an extra letter. >> Arindam's contraction to e=mcc shows his disdain. > > Arindam has used this same disdainful gesture on his own > formula that he offers as a superior alternative to E=mcc This is Arindam. Since he has no supporters for his crackpot theories he has to make one up.