Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Spacetime Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 13:02:41 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: References: <46633b77bddb3b8bcf79567060ac4687@www.novabbs.com> <17df34493bf564b0$2$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <0a665fd1dd94ee470ba43429fc105685@www.novabbs.com> <17df53c4f99a2ba1$4$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <218b16d0b70e123e8080248841a790cc@www.novabbs.com> <17df5b7290763e62$4$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <17df60e734bf7fc5$309$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <6fb64361087171309a547e096c239ac7@www.novabbs.com> <17dfa6d8b434b0f5$405$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <17dfbb5aaef8c13f$658$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <249c351f4d5b98ef1de8bafee17ef341@www.novabbs.com> <17dfd7e92e4092ac$304$498727$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2463755"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$5CdDig7CPYm.0qs4amUk5.ojrTvZFJT3YXVYtmPcef.2QSabpYUeu X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 3075 Lines: 37 On Sun, 7 Jul 2024 5:42:59 (UTC), Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > W dniu 06.07.2024 o 23:41, gharnagel pisze: > > > > On Sat, 6 Jul 2024 20:59:41 (UTC), Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > > > > > W dniu 06.07.2024 o 21:59, gharnagel pisze: > > > > > > > > Cats exist in the physical world but numbers don't, so > > > > > > So - the smallest prime number  doesn't > > > exist. Right, Harrie, poor halfbrain? > > > > so Wozzie-pig keeps deleting so he will just be left oinking, > > lying and slandering again and again.  The basic question is, > > do nonphysical things have existence? > > No, trash, mistaken as usual. Sorry, oinker, you're trying to avoid responsibility for defining "exist." > Your pseudophilosophy is no way basic No philosophy involved, only a simple definition. > - the basic question is: does the smallest prime number exist or not. No, Wozzie-the-lying-oinker, the basic question is, what do you mean by "exist"? You refuse to answer so you leave it up to me. I interpret that to mean "physically," and therefore numbers, all numbers, don't exist. I gave you this answer several times but your skull seems to be made of neutronium since you come back again and again asking the same question. What do you expect, a different answer? Are you insane? "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." -- Albert Einstein