Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Python Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Approximately 300,000 km/s With Respect To What? Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 16:08:25 +0200 Organization: CCCP Lines: 53 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 16:08:26 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="05457785d4e8ee4561f1afbdc81e5bb2"; logging-data="3721454"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19HkFRjBTqJkc12EQuhoDzv" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:bN9bSLXqKQpmVvJjArs1s2k5ouU= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3455 Le 20/07/2024 à 08:25, Thomas Heger a écrit : > Am Freitag000019, 19.07.2024 um 14:39 schrieb Richard Hachel: >> Le 19/07/2024 à 12:22, Thomas Heger a écrit : >>>> student. >>> >>> We have several other contributers like Poincare, Lorentz and >>> cerainly a lot of others. >>> >>> But we have Einstein's paper and Einstein himself. >>> >>> He got almost deified, even if his paper is full of errors. >>> >>> To me this seems to be intentional and to the disadvantage of mankind. >> >> Yes, this seems to be intentional. >> Il fallait déifier Einstein pour enfoncer Poincaré. > > What if this WAS actually intentional? > > Who were the people behind this?? > > It must be an immense system, with tremendous wealth and power. > > This is so because to make Einstein that popular would require a lot of > power and control of several different media. > > The number of errors in einstein's paper is also extremely large, hence > that 'system' would need permanent control over large parts of science. > > Also a mechanism for sanctions against dissidents would be useful. > > But for what reasons would any system take such an amount of efforts??? > > Certainly something not very beneficial, because otherwise we would be > told about it. Even as fond you are to pathetically stupid "theories" (growing Earth, Hitler is a British spy, etc.) you seem to realize, somewhat, how stupid your claims are? There is a far simpler way to explain everything - There are no significant mistakes in Einstein's article - What Einstein presented there and "modern" SRT are exactly the same theory. What has been done since 1905 is geometrizing the theory. This leaded the path to GR - You are not at all competent to evaluate 1905 article : 100% of your comments are asinine - There are no "dissidents". Most physicists understand very well the theory and a lot of tried to supersede it with new concepts, they are not "silenced" they are encouraged to do so