Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 16:11:44 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Spacetime Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <46633b77bddb3b8bcf79567060ac4687@www.novabbs.com> <17df34493bf564b0$2$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <0a665fd1dd94ee470ba43429fc105685@www.novabbs.com> <17df53c4f99a2ba1$4$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <218b16d0b70e123e8080248841a790cc@www.novabbs.com> <17df5b7290763e62$4$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <17df60e734bf7fc5$309$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <6fb64361087171309a547e096c239ac7@www.novabbs.com> <17dfa6d8b434b0f5$405$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <17dfbb5aaef8c13f$658$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <249c351f4d5b98ef1de8bafee17ef341@www.novabbs.com> <17dfd7e92e4092ac$304$498727$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 36 Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2024 14:11:44 +0000 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17dff3ac6dc01c44$315$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> X-Received-Bytes: 2762 Bytes: 2889 W dniu 07.07.2024 o 15:02, gharnagel pisze: > On Sun, 7 Jul 2024 5:42:59 (UTC), Maciej Wozniak wrote: >> >> W dniu 06.07.2024 o 23:41, gharnagel pisze: >> > >> > On Sat, 6 Jul 2024 20:59:41 (UTC), Maciej Wozniak wrote: >> > > >> > > W dniu 06.07.2024 o 21:59, gharnagel pisze: >> > > > >> > > > Cats exist in the physical world but numbers don't, so >> > > >> > > So - the smallest prime number  doesn't >> > > exist. Right, Harrie, poor halfbrain? >> > >> > so Wozzie-pig keeps deleting so he will just be left oinking, >> > lying and slandering again and again.  The basic question is, >> > do nonphysical things have existence? >> >> No, trash, mistaken as usual. > > Sorry, oinker, you're trying to avoid responsibility for defining > "exist." Right after you define "defining", poor trash. > >> Your pseudophilosophy is no way basic > > No philosophy involved, only a simple definition. So, by [your] "definition" (sic!) - the smallest prime doesn't exist. Right, poor halfbrain? BTW, can you point experiments confirming your pseudophilosophical dillema to be basic?