Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jim Pennino Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k) Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:40:05 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 29 Message-ID: <34q2mk-tnok1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> References: <2222c43775e520228c1cf40786424435@www.novabbs.com> <06telk-jcsn.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <02797b9bc51252f1f2d1cca6e42735e3@www.novabbs.com> <0sd0mk-q79h1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> Injection-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 18:46:04 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d175af432983231444cc080c7ce3e9a9"; logging-data="2101848"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19cGgkMR5iHUyVG0/LLUEAn" User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-113-lowlatency (x86_64)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:2+G698ISKVbxEDLqrDkHbJI4uak= Bytes: 2515 David Canzi wrote: > On 7/9/24 18:05, Jim Pennino wrote: >> David Canzi wrote: >>> On 7/9/24 14:58, Jim Pennino wrote: >>>> David Canzi wrote: >>>>> On 7/3/24 20:38, bertietaylor wrote: >>>>>> The nonsense that is e=mcc cannot be glorified with the exponential >>>>>> operator and an extra letter. >>>>>> Arindam's contraction to e=mcc shows his disdain. >>>>> >>>>> Arindam has used this same disdainful gesture on his own >>>>> formula that he offers as a superior alternative to E=mcc >>>> >>>> This is Arindam. >>> >>> It isn't always necessary to say so. >> >> True, it is pretty obvious to anyone paying attention, but most people >> don't pay any attention to your posts, Aridam. > > If replacing c^2 with cc in Einstein's formula is Arindam's way of > expressing disdain for Einstein's formula, what are we to make of > the fact that Arindam's formula, e=0.5mVVN(N-k), contains VV instead > of V^2? Is he disdaining his own formula? Nope, just demonstrating his lack of knowledge of mathematical notation and his childish habit of mangling things to show everyone how clever he thinks he is.