Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 11:32:23 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <v8gdan$288f9$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v7gl30$3j9fi$1@dont-email.me> <v7lsg5$luh0$5@dont-email.me>
 <v7nm9m$1433k$1@dont-email.me> <v7ofe7$17h8r$6@dont-email.me>
 <v7qfu0$1m6vf$1@dont-email.me> <v7r040$1onhe$3@dont-email.me>
 <v7vlbj$2ofet$1@dont-email.me> <v80a2u$2rabc$4@dont-email.me>
 <v825jo$39i9l$1@dont-email.me> <v82u9d$3dftr$3@dont-email.me>
 <v8306v$3c7$1@news.muc.de> <v83161$3dftr$11@dont-email.me>
 <v84udt$3rp4t$1@dont-email.me> <v8bc6j$159av$1@dont-email.me>
 <ea673a5b4ed43fbddf938c69bd013b0cf2ca325d@i2pn2.org>
 <v8c6kb$1de3l$1@dont-email.me>
 <9f3112e056ad6eebf35f940c34b802b46addcad4@i2pn2.org>
 <v8cde0$1ecgo$1@dont-email.me> <v8ctgt$1gbu7$4@dont-email.me>
 <v8dkc3$1kii7$3@dont-email.me> <v8e55v$1nrnh$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8e9vu$1oqd7$1@dont-email.me> <v8fftq$22ege$3@dont-email.me>
 <v8fuj5$24rl1$10@dont-email.me> <v8g1j7$24u77$6@dont-email.me>
 <v8g2jl$26d7d$1@dont-email.me> <v8g5oq$26s53$5@dont-email.me>
 <v8g658$276fl$1@dont-email.me>
 <9d2f2d8a1bf9614b9d8ab56bd500a78075b365e4@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 18:32:24 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3121e7e48560b53e45601f59b50fa691";
	logging-data="2367977"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+82AxQw1OXuEm2+YtYnD66"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4skXZq2ise6XzB0DjUjQTO2apjo=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <9d2f2d8a1bf9614b9d8ab56bd500a78075b365e4@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 4115

On 8/1/2024 11:11 AM, joes wrote:
> Am Thu, 01 Aug 2024 09:30:00 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>> On 8/1/2024 9:23 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>> Op 01.aug.2024 om 15:29 schreef olcott:
>>>> On 8/1/2024 8:12 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>> Op 01.aug.2024 om 14:20 schreef olcott:
>>>>>> On 8/1/2024 3:10 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>> Op 31.jul.2024 om 23:23 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>> On 7/31/2024 3:01 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Op 31.jul.2024 om 17:14 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>> On 7/31/2024 3:44 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Op 31.jul.2024 om 06:09 schreef olcott:
> 
>>>>> The trace stops and hides what happens when 000015d2 is called.
>>>>> Olcott is hiding the conditional branch instructions in the
>>>>> recursion.
>>>> These next lines conclusively prove that DDD is being correctly
>>>> emulated by HHH after DDD calls HHH(DDD).
>>> It also shows that HHH when simulating itself, does not reach the end
>>> of its own simulation.
>> If you weren't a clueless wonder you would understand that DDD correctly
>> emulated by HHH including HHH emulating itself emulated DDD has no end
>> of correct emulation.

> It does if the simulated HHH aborts, but its simulating copy preempts
> that. Indeed, it has no choice, but if it didn't abort, the simulation
> wouldn't abort either. Therefore it can't simulate itself.
> 

<MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
     If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D
     until H correctly determines that its simulated D would never
     stop running unless aborted then

     H can abort its simulation of D and correctly report that D
     specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations.
</MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>

I spent two years carefully composing the above before I even
asked professor Sipser to review it.

DDD is correctly emulated by HHH until HHH sees the same
never ending pattern that anyone else can see.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer