Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: David Canzi Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Down with e=mcc up with e=0.5mvvN(N-k) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 14:39:06 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <2222c43775e520228c1cf40786424435@www.novabbs.com> <06telk-jcsn.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <02797b9bc51252f1f2d1cca6e42735e3@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 20:39:08 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="87beb5e40eda3d5ef80a8da5f32a3153"; logging-data="1575430"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/4qiR9NbHRw8p+sjuzGbLj" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:FweGlxVonSXClpVIz6FcH2apPF0= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <02797b9bc51252f1f2d1cca6e42735e3@www.novabbs.com> Bytes: 2322 On 7/3/24 20:38, bertietaylor wrote: > The nonsense that is e=mcc cannot be glorified with the exponential > operator and an extra letter. > Arindam's contraction to e=mcc shows his disdain. Arindam has used this same disdainful gesture on his own formula that he offers as a superior alternative to E=mcc | My book "To the Stars" was published in Jan 2000 in my new "adda" | website. I presented my new formula e=0.5mVVN(N-k) to explain mass | and energy relationships on a kinetic and non-destructive basis. The following header lines are from that article: | From: Arindam Banerjee | Date: Tue, 02 Apr 24 07:38:40 +0000 | Subject: Re: Getting there at last... | Message-ID: People who retain articles long enough in their news reading software and people who know how to use a Message-ID to get an article from a news server can verify this.