Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Array vs. Linked List Traversal Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 23:14:40 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 9 Message-ID: References: <785fcf1ed0f5cd2700c9fd4970b4ef79@www.novabbs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 01:14:41 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="480e27b3b4cc073acc0e6062d3b4dc69"; logging-data="2561536"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19wkk8B9p6MpW+WtjpaVScp" User-Agent: Pan/0.159 (Vovchansk; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:2NTCi9+LD6WcfBKvgmJOzYF88Pk= Bytes: 1258 On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 15:49:35 +0000, MitchAlsup1 wrote: > The next element address in an array can be found by addition > The next element address in a linked list can be found by a load > > With cache hits, add is 1 cycle > With cache hits, load is 3-4 cycles Hence the term, “pointer-chasing”.